Gnizmo said:
woopdeedoo said:
Do it like the guys in the NFL. If there's a close call, or some rather obvious mistake by the referee the team manager/trainer can challenge it - If it's clear that the ref was wrong the challenge goes through, if not you lose the chance to put a player in.
|
And stop the game for like 3 minutes. Fuck that. There are no time outs in soccer, and there shouldn't be. Challenges implemented after the game for tournaments are fine in my book, but nothing that would make the game as boring as other sports. This coming from a fan of USA who was robbed of a win just over a day ago.
@Lordflashheart How could they possibly implement it without stopping play? The referee has to watch the tape, and that means play can't resume. Soccer is a game of little or no downtime. Anything that takes away from that has no place in the game.
|
Just very quickly of the top of my head it could be introduced slowly. So if it's a corner and the refs not sure if there was shirt pulling and if the guy was on side he could have the ref check if it was a goal or not. Would have come in handy a few days ago.
If there's a hand ball that leads to a goal the refs given the video ref could inform the ref on the pitch or the ref can go for confirmation. Football is stop and start with all the diving so as long as the video refs not too intrusive and doesn't hold up play for too long it might not ruin the game.
There needs to be very clear rules what it can and can't be used for. I don't think Football should use the ref for too much. Like you say there's not too much downtime but in this world cup there has been. Personally i would like it used to stamp out all this falling to the ground feigning injury.