Well actually, look at the premiership table then compare it to the worlds rich list.

You might see a pattern forming with ManchesterUTD being top of both.

but united are 3rd on the rich list so whats your point?

(in terms of revenue last year).

1) Real Madrid: 401.4m euros
2) Barcelona: 365.9m euros
3) Man Utd: 327m euros
4) Bayern Munich: 289.5m euros
5) Arsenal: 263m euros
6) Chelsea: 242.3m
7) Liverpool: 217m euros
8) Juventus: 202.3m euros
9) Inter Milan 196.5m euros
10) AC Milan: 196.5.m euros

Edit: A lot has to do with individual tv deals, if the English clubs had those they would be 1 & 2

Laws and stuff

Dallas cowboys for the win. Oh wait wrong football. Sorry about that. lol

yeah man utd really stufferd because of the fall of stirling against the euro. i read if the pound stay at the same rate vs the euro from 200/09

man utd would have been top

In past seasons when ManUTD have had success many people argued they were the richest club in the world. So as you put it, money can buy you success.

Chelsea aswell, they hadn't won the league for ~50 years. Then overnight they win the league twice. You honestly think that had nothing to do with the large amounts of money spent on players? - Money does buy success, not always as an immediate result but it does.

Hamburg have done nothing and somehow manage to be 2-1 up at half.

Sporting and Atletico Madrid tied

Jesus is anyone watching the Spurs Blackburn game? Webb is having a terrible game. Just disallowed a contender for goal of the season for nothing. I hate that guy.

yes i saw it,lucky for us he did disallow it,good goal though

good win for the spurs,had to break blackburn down,got lucky and won the game

well done pavlyuchenko