By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gamepro plaigarizes IGN's review

How do you fuck up such an easy and great job. Lol there's a lot of doods on VGchatz who white this stuff for free.



Around the Network
twesterm said:
blaydcor said:
It seems that all of you people screaming "Coincidence!1" didn't actually read the article, which highlighted blatant similarities alongside the several WORD FOR WORD quotes (this does not happen by coincidence) AND the fact the the guy ADMITTED TO THE PLAGIARISM. Seriously, read more than the title before you post and defend the guy.

I admit I didn't read the last quote saying he admitted to it, but I don't see the big deal to the part he copied.  Both of those pieces could have been copied straight from a manual they are so generic (I know there isn't a manual, just saying it's incredibly straightforward explanation). 

If the actual creative parts of the review had been copied, yes, there is a reason to be angry, but the he copied the most straightforward part that even if he had written himself it probably would have ended up sounding almost exactly the same.  It's not a big deal.

If it hadn't been for this "fiasco" maybe 20 people would have read both of those reviews anyways.  Would you really want to spend all your time on a review that isn't going to get read by many people or get that review finished and move on to the bigger ones that make the site more money?

Again, if he had actually copied the creative parts of the review, yes, that would be inexcusable, but those parts that are the same, who cares?  There are only so many ways you can say those things.  I bet if you asked 100 people to play most any simple game to the point they could review it and then ask them to explain the mechanics you would see results pretty close to the one above.

The guy stole money from Gamepro.  What do you think should have happened?  Should he have been promoted?



 

Tired of big government?
Want liberty in your lifetime?
Join us @
http://www.freestateproject.org

twesterm said:
Saki said:
He admitted to plagiarizing......

Well then I'm an ass.

It's the new avatar.  It's just not helping you.  You're forgetting your core philosophies.



dsister44 said:
Saki said:
dsister44 said:
Wow!

he got fired over one line. I hope they can sleep soundly at night

Wow you think he is not at fault?

Its a Wiiware game. If you cant give your own opinion over a fucking Wiiware game then you shoulnt be reviewing games.


No! there should have been some kind of punishment, but i do not think he should have been fired. 

 

The real question is journalistic ethics and how well trusted the writer is. when a journalist breaches ethics it is as serious as a cop who shop lifts or a lawyer who abuses the law. Our society  needs people in a variety of professions to uphold strictest standards so that we can trust them. If we cannot trust them, they are effectively unable to do their job. If he was not fired he would have caused everyone connected with his work to become suspect undoing not just his work- but he work of his  co-workers as well. A swift firing and public apology is the only course of action in a case like this.



"But as always, technology refused to be dignity's bitch."--Vance DeGeneres

 

http://cheezburger.com/danatblair/lolz/View/4772264960

Final-Fan said:
twesterm said:
blaydcor said:
It seems that all of you people screaming "Coincidence!1" didn't actually read the article, which highlighted blatant similarities alongside the several WORD FOR WORD quotes (this does not happen by coincidence) AND the fact the the guy ADMITTED TO THE PLAGIARISM. Seriously, read more than the title before you post and defend the guy.

I admit I didn't read the last quote saying he admitted to it, but I don't see the big deal to the part he copied.  Both of those pieces could have been copied straight from a manual they are so generic (I know there isn't a manual, just saying it's incredibly straightforward explanation). 

If the actual creative parts of the review had been copied, yes, there is a reason to be angry, but the he copied the most straightforward part that even if he had written himself it probably would have ended up sounding almost exactly the same.  It's not a big deal.

If it hadn't been for this "fiasco" maybe 20 people would have read both of those reviews anyways.  Would you really want to spend all your time on a review that isn't going to get read by many people or get that review finished and move on to the bigger ones that make the site more money?

Again, if he had actually copied the creative parts of the review, yes, that would be inexcusable, but those parts that are the same, who cares?  There are only so many ways you can say those things.  I bet if you asked 100 people to play most any simple game to the point they could review it and then ask them to explain the mechanics you would see results pretty close to the one above.

This just in, twesterm only cares about intellectual property if it's games, not words, being stolen. 

Glad to know I'm not the only one who sees a great contradiction with twesterm's positions.

Also, they had no choice but to fire him. Every following review he would have written would have been dismissed by comments like "Did he really play the game this time?"



Signature goes here!

Around the Network

Too bad for him, his career is all over.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

"I would also like to point out that Andrew was not a paid employee of GamePro or GamePro Arcade; he was an unpaid contributor who worked mainly for the experience"

Just since a lot of people seem to have missed that.  Anyways, GamePro pretty much took the best action possible in this situation.  I bet the guy is kicking himself for ruining his future journalism career over a wiiware game review.



exindguy said:
noname2200 said:
dsister44 said:
Wow!

he got fired over one line. I hope they can sleep soundly at night

It was actually several lines, but only three (I missed one the first time, will bold now) were copy-pasted directly from IGN's review. Remember, plagiarism is more than simply copy-pasting. Moreover, the fact that a supposed professional is plagiarizing even one line is a huge ethical no-no. Remember the Stephen Ambrose bru-haha a few years back over a single paragraph in a 300 page+ book?


Actually, in the case of Ambrose, it turned out he was a serial plagiarizer with at least a half-dozen of his books cited as containing material from works not his own (even dating back to his bloody doctoral thesis!).

Huh, never knew: I thought that paragraph was the full extent of it.



I'm glad he was fired. Plagiarism is serious business. It will get you kicked out of most Universities if your professor/dean decide to take it that far, and at the very least will get you a double F. I see no reason why ethics shouldn't be upheld in the real world too. There are many people out there who would write better quality and more accurate reviews for free than what has been produced of some professionals over the last few years.

Gamepro did the right thing but it still makes you wonder about the quality of their writing staff. How hard is it to play a Wiiware game for a few hours and write a descriptive and accurate synopsis without copying or paraphrasing?  Its not like he was writing a 10 page review of a JRPG that took him 100 hours to beat.



           Now Playing!

 

^ This is you!

flagship said:
Glad to see gamepro was up front about it and fired his ass, blatant plagiarism shouldn't be tolerated.


This!