By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS3 v.s 360 Cost Comparison... PS3 Is Cheaper To Game On!

Vashyo said:
I read an article last year when I was about to buy a ps3 about the console-prices in a gaming magazine and I came to a conclusion that I would save money on the long run if I would get the ps3, after that I was looking for upcoming games and my mate called me that he just got mgs4 and it was awesome and I read positive reviews of it so I just had to go and get it the next day, I haven't regretted single day since I got my ps3. :)
It has great variety in games, steady library growth, blu-ray if I want to rent a HD-movie, free online gaming, ps3 exclusive game developers are really ambitious (lot of awesome games have come and are coming in a year).

I respect people's opinions of getting the 360 (They bought it so they like what the console has to offer). but please PS3 is cheaper in the long run there's no need to argue about this. 360 is only cheaper if you don't use online or buy anything extra to it.

I guess you didn't factor in the fact that many classic/brilliant Xbox 360 titles are/were cut price titles at the time.



Tease.

Around the Network
Vashyo said:
I read an article last year when I was about to buy a ps3 about the console-prices in a gaming magazine and I came to a conclusion that I would save money on the long run if I would get the ps3, after that I was looking for upcoming games and my mate called me that he just got mgs4 and it was awesome and I read positive reviews of it so I just had to go and get it the next day, I haven't regretted single day since I got my ps3. :)
It has great variety in games, steady library growth, blu-ray if I want to rent a HD-movie, free online gaming, ps3 exclusive game developers are really ambitious (lot of awesome games have come and are coming in a year).

I respect people's opinions of getting the 360 (They bought it so they like what the console has to offer). but please PS3 is cheaper in the long run there's no need to argue about this. 360 is only cheaper if you don't use online or buy anything extra to it.

 

What is the point of the thread?

This is fairly simple, the total cost of ownership of a 360 is based on how you use it, the total cost of ownership of a PS3 is fixed. This means that comparing price must be done in a context, there is no absolute price for 360 to use and if you pick one you are comparing prices for only a subset of the market. In the absence of statistics on model and accesory breakdowns for the 360 we cannot compute a real average cost of ownership for the 360 so this entire concept of saying x is cheaper then y is pointless. If your goal is to educate people on the costs involved in owning an HD concole you are wasting your effort here because I would be shocked if 90 percent of the users here were not quite clear on the topic.

If this area really interests you then a better topic would be to compare the market strategy used by MS and Sony, namely increased user choice at higher per feature expense versus many integrated features with low per feature costs with a higher entry cost. This is actually a very interesting topic but we are not addressing it at all with this thread.

Off Topic: Why is it so hard for some people to accept that not everyone thinks and wants the same things they do? Just because you would not find it useful to own a 360 arcade without live and a wireless adapter it is arrogant and foolish to assume nobody does, especially in the face of current market data.



Well, since both sides love pulling in silly comparisons, let me pull them all together. This should end the cost arguments... :P (Prices in US$, all items bought from Amazon)

  PS3 360 Wii
System w/ HD or SD card $400 $300 $335*
Wireless adaptor $0 $77 $0
Online play $0 $45/yr $0
Backward compatibility $100 $0 $0
Blu-ray player $0 $180 $180
Out-of-warranty repairs $230 $100 $100
Extra controller (all parts) $43 $40 $74
Speech attachment $43 $20 $29
Motion sensing/control $32+** n/a** $0
HDTV (40" 1080P) $680 $680 $780***
TOTAL $1528 $1442 $1498

 

Right... so how can most people afford gaming, anyway? Maybe this is why sales for the "other" system are so bad , and why Wii is doomed?

*: 32 GB SD card included with price

**: PS3 Wand and 360 Natal prices not availiable, not yet released.

***: Upscaler purchased elsewhere (www.hdtvsupply.com), due to limited availiability



-dunno001

-On a quest for the truly perfect game; I don't think it exists...

Yeah how can a $700 Xbox 360 beat a $399 soon to be a $299 PS3? It out sells it every week wow!

 

 

What do Bmaker11 and MikeB have in common? 

The name.

They both make up (facts)

they both favor the Trey.

They both have yet to  be banned.

They both have a simluar ip address. (Unknown)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



mrstickball said:
BMaker11 said:
mrstickball said:
Hey BMarker,

Can you cite that the current crop of 360's have a 30% fail rate? If not, I feel a ban may be coming on.

Article was written when the author spoke of Dead Rising, Halo 3, Gears of War, and a 40GB PS3. I'll take the assumption that this is from 2007 or early 2008. So in the frame of reference from when the article was written, 30% is correct. Banning me because of that would then lead me to question the moderating staff. If people can get banned for facts, then what next?

You know, I could also bring up an article about how every Playstation failed due to bad lasers on their initial run(s) and leave out pertienent facts such as that I'm talking about the PS1, or the fact that later models were fixed.

You and I both know that the early 360's were often cited at having a 30% failure rate. That does not mean that every Xbox 360 made since the article has that failure rate. Falcons and Jaspers fixed the problem. Since you seem to know the Xbox 360 well (as you post on the Microsoft forums quite often), you should know that failure rates have dropped significantly since the introduction of said models.

Not only this, when we're comparing the $199.99 and other price points, we must note that we're comparing current hardware revisions. The Xbox 360's with the 30% failure rate did not cost $199.99 for the Arcade. They costed $299.99. While your at it, why not compare the price of a 60GB PS3 to a 20GB 360 premium from 2006 at $399.99? Afterall, your only going to get those failure rates with those consoles.

You should *really* know better than to cite old articles spouting even older sales information.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_problems

they haven't been fixed, they still scratch disc due poor design, so don't move 360 while playing and the 360 RE 5 bundle i have seen it E74.

which thankfully its fixeable now, but before microsoft was pointing it as out of warranty, they wouldn't even fix it.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/xbox-360-red-ring-of-death-problems-finally-solved/

"Switching to 65nm only alleviated the problem, it certainly did nothing to conclusively fix it. The cause of the RROD is that the motherboard warps and flexes due to overheating and the GPU and/or CPU eventually become unseated. That's why most RROD warranty returns are repaired rather than replaced - because the RROD doesn't actually "fry" anything on your Xbox, it just requires the GPU to be re-secured. Switching to 65nm only reduces overheating but it doesn't change the basic design of the motherboard which does not secure the GPU sufficiently. Unless you call their pathetic attempt at gluing the corners of the GPU and CPU a "solution". I suppose it does address the proximal cause of RROD's, but it is about as much a "solution" as buying new clothes is a solution for being overweight."

tonicboy from engadget.



Around the Network
Xoj said:
mrstickball said:
BMaker11 said:
mrstickball said:
Hey BMarker,

Can you cite that the current crop of 360's have a 30% fail rate? If not, I feel a ban may be coming on.

Article was written when the author spoke of Dead Rising, Halo 3, Gears of War, and a 40GB PS3. I'll take the assumption that this is from 2007 or early 2008. So in the frame of reference from when the article was written, 30% is correct. Banning me because of that would then lead me to question the moderating staff. If people can get banned for facts, then what next?

You know, I could also bring up an article about how every Playstation failed due to bad lasers on their initial run(s) and leave out pertienent facts such as that I'm talking about the PS1, or the fact that later models were fixed.

You and I both know that the early 360's were often cited at having a 30% failure rate. That does not mean that every Xbox 360 made since the article has that failure rate. Falcons and Jaspers fixed the problem. Since you seem to know the Xbox 360 well (as you post on the Microsoft forums quite often), you should know that failure rates have dropped significantly since the introduction of said models.

Not only this, when we're comparing the $199.99 and other price points, we must note that we're comparing current hardware revisions. The Xbox 360's with the 30% failure rate did not cost $199.99 for the Arcade. They costed $299.99. While your at it, why not compare the price of a 60GB PS3 to a 20GB 360 premium from 2006 at $399.99? Afterall, your only going to get those failure rates with those consoles.

You should *really* know better than to cite old articles spouting even older sales information.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_problems

they haven't been fixed, they still scratch disc due poor design, so don't move 360 while playing and the 360 RE 5 bundle i have seen it E74.

which thankfully its fixeable now, but before microsoft was pointing it as out of warranty, they wouldn't even fix it.

lol, on the top of the article it says it needs more sources xD

Edit: the last relevant link on the bottom of the page is from 2007(besides on complaining of the nxe)



Lets see xbox 360 has great games with great software sales, the 360 is expensive then its better.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

NiKKoM said:
So this means that the more expensive 360 outsells a cheaper ps3 right? That's the point of this thread? right?

WOW!!!

 

This has so Much Win....even I feel OWNED!



 



Squilliam said:
Vashyo said:
I read an article last year when I was about to buy a ps3 about the console-prices in a gaming magazine and I came to a conclusion that I would save money on the long run if I would get the ps3, after that I was looking for upcoming games and my mate called me that he just got mgs4 and it was awesome and I read positive reviews of it so I just had to go and get it the next day, I haven't regretted single day since I got my ps3. :)
It has great variety in games, steady library growth, blu-ray if I want to rent a HD-movie, free online gaming, ps3 exclusive game developers are really ambitious (lot of awesome games have come and are coming in a year).

I respect people's opinions of getting the 360 (They bought it so they like what the console has to offer). but please PS3 is cheaper in the long run there's no need to argue about this. 360 is only cheaper if you don't use online or buy anything extra to it.

I guess you didn't factor in the fact that many classic/brilliant Xbox 360 titles are/were cut price titles at the time.


Brilliant for you maybe but not me. I don't care about most of the 360 exclusives overall and the ones I do care about I allready have on PC. The only game I want right now is Fable 2 and I'm not going to buy a console just to get that one game, it's not just good enough.

 

@billsalias didn't I just say that I respect people who get the console that suit them? It's not my business so I'm not going to force anyone to buy a PS3 if they so hate it, I can't see nothing arrogant and foolish in that.

 

@Aion of course expensive is better, people keep complaining how PS3 is too expensive. :)



Xoj said:
mrstickball said:
BMaker11 said:
mrstickball said:
Hey BMarker,

Can you cite that the current crop of 360's have a 30% fail rate? If not, I feel a ban may be coming on.

Article was written when the author spoke of Dead Rising, Halo 3, Gears of War, and a 40GB PS3. I'll take the assumption that this is from 2007 or early 2008. So in the frame of reference from when the article was written, 30% is correct. Banning me because of that would then lead me to question the moderating staff. If people can get banned for facts, then what next?

You know, I could also bring up an article about how every Playstation failed due to bad lasers on their initial run(s) and leave out pertienent facts such as that I'm talking about the PS1, or the fact that later models were fixed.

You and I both know that the early 360's were often cited at having a 30% failure rate. That does not mean that every Xbox 360 made since the article has that failure rate. Falcons and Jaspers fixed the problem. Since you seem to know the Xbox 360 well (as you post on the Microsoft forums quite often), you should know that failure rates have dropped significantly since the introduction of said models.

Not only this, when we're comparing the $199.99 and other price points, we must note that we're comparing current hardware revisions. The Xbox 360's with the 30% failure rate did not cost $199.99 for the Arcade. They costed $299.99. While your at it, why not compare the price of a 60GB PS3 to a 20GB 360 premium from 2006 at $399.99? Afterall, your only going to get those failure rates with those consoles.

You should *really* know better than to cite old articles spouting even older sales information.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_problems

they haven't been fixed, they still scratch disc due poor design, so don't move 360 while playing and the 360 RE 5 bundle i have seen it E74.

which thankfully its fixeable now, but before microsoft was pointing it as out of warranty, they wouldn't even fix it.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/xbox-360-red-ring-of-death-problems-finally-solved/

"Switching to 65nm only alleviated the problem, it certainly did nothing to conclusively fix it. The cause of the RROD is that the motherboard warps and flexes due to overheating and the GPU and/or CPU eventually become unseated. That's why most RROD warranty returns are repaired rather than replaced - because the RROD doesn't actually "fry" anything on your Xbox, it just requires the GPU to be re-secured. Switching to 65nm only reduces overheating but it doesn't change the basic design of the motherboard which does not secure the GPU sufficiently. Unless you call their pathetic attempt at gluing the corners of the GPU and CPU a "solution". I suppose it does address the proximal cause of RROD's, but it is about as much a "solution" as buying new clothes is a solution for being overweight."

tonicboy from engadget.

You are correct in stating RRoDs can still happen. Just like the PS3 can have GPU issues, or the Wii can as well. The difference is that the modifications to Falcon and Jasper units have significantly, and I mean significantly, reduced the rate of issues. Even then E74 errors have been very sparse, and any repair aggregate I've seen puts RRoD/E74 occurance rates at about 1/10th that of what RRoDs alone were in 2006-2007 when the Xbox 360 racked up the repair issues.

And Tonicboy forgot to state that thanks to the 65nm process, and the Jasper, internal core temperatures have dropped very significantly since the initial run of Xbox 360s. Not only is there an extra heatsink, new thermal paste, a 53 watt power reduction, but that all translates to a significantly lower core temperature. AnandTech has a great dissection of the Jasper, and their analysis of the fix. I would suggest reading up on actual issues between E74 and RRoD before spouting off random quotes that aren't based on actual hardware failures. The NeoGAF aggregate is a great place to read up on the 2,000-odd confirmed Xboxes that have bit the dust. Quite a large number. They have some pretty charts showing when the Falcon went into the wild, as well as Jasper, and the concurrent dropoffs in hardware errors. They will always be there, but I can assure you that between the E74 and RRoD, problems still exist, but they are more inline with current PS3/Wii reliability realms. Of course, only the 360 has the 3 year warranty



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.