This guy got it.

 Havent you wondered why this isnt aprooved by any other country or group of countries?

I stumbled across a pretty good blog post on this issue:

http://weeksnotice.blogspot.com/2009/07/honduras-summing-up-some-basic-points.html

1. According to the constitution, taking Zelaya out of the country was illegal. Period.

4. Zelaya was unpopular (even with his own party) and many people in Honduras are glad he's gone. This is irrelevant to the law. Surprisingly, I have not yet seen anyone make an argument for how a parliamentary system might have mediated the situation better--Honduran political institutions are so weak it might not have mattered.

* It is also troubling for a Supreme Court justice to use the gossipy phrase "some say" as in "some say it was not Zelaya but Chavez governing."

Please tell me you're joking. So, in your view he's done something unconstitutional (I don't agree with that, but let's go with that) and you're encouraging an action that's CLEARLY unconsititutional??? I don't know exactly the Honduran Constitution and elgefe can correct me if I'm wrong, but most Latin American Constitutions are the same, so I think I can use mine fine.

The Argentinian Constitution states clearly that any government that's not elected by a democratic process stated in the Constitution is illegal, unconstitutional and it's a DUTY of any argentinian citizen to stand against it. In this case, the coup d'etat is unconstitutional. Yet you're defending it, claiming that it's done to "defeat an illegality"???

Clearly, you got a BIG contradiction.

i don't know how many people are honduran in here but i'm so heres what i think:

the asshole that is now president(roberto micheletti bain) has being wanted to be for years, he lost internal elections these year and tried to stop the candidate who beat him with political barriers, yet he failed. the referendum isn't ilegal, the congress(run by micheletti) actually passed a law that allowed, but here is my favorite part: the people who run the country(those with money) feared that the referendum would bring a chavez-like govermetn to the country, so they launched a mass(gigantic, besides burger king comercials every other ad ran at tv was of that) campaign against it, the capitalist monkeys of my country ate it up and as always licked the ass of the money guys. then again, when society doesn't want to be saved, well it won't be saved.

Very informative, and added to the emilie autumn comment then we can say its typical whats happening. Right wing rich people are scarring poor and convincing them they wont have freedom anymore because many of them could consider Zelaya a comunist or something in that order, its typical in south american countries and that added to the little development of institutions in Honduras added to economic state we have a division in society.

We thought coups where from the last century but this one is here to proove that latin american countries are still afected by things like this and populism(?) coming from right and left wing pwerful minorities in our countries. 

I agree it's typical. I think argentinian society has evolved to a point that it won't ever support again a coup d'etat (at least it's what I like to think), too many horrible things have happened, and the society views our army with distrust, hate and reject (something that couldn't make me happier).

But I know what you mean, other Latin American countries haven't sadly reached that point.

And to add to your point, one only has to take a look on how is each side composed to know what kind of coup this is

Quoting an Argentinian newspaper, BEFORE the coup

http://www.clarin.com/diario/2009/06/28/elmundo/i-01947826.htm

La oposición está conformada por sectores políticos, empresariales, dueños de medios de comunicación, militares, la jerarquía de las iglesias católica y evangélica. Se oponen a la consulta el Tribunal Supremo Electoral, la Corte Suprema, la fiscalía general, el Congreso y la procuraduría general.
A favor están las organizaciones obreras, campesinas, indígenas, maestros, estudiantes, algunos gremios profesionales y el partido de izquierda Unificación Democrática.

Translated, it would be:

The opposition (to Zelaya) is composed by poilitcal and empresarial sectors, mass media owners, military and the hierarchy of the catholic and evangelic church. The poll is being opposed by the Supreme Electoral Tribune, the Supreme Court, the general prosecution, the Congress and the Solicitor's Office. Supporting Zelaya are the worker, farmer and native organizations, the teachers, students, some professional Unions and the left-wing party Democratic Unification

Yeah, kinda telling, what kind of "illegality" this was...

Americans are very ignorant on this matter.  The whole thing got a minor note from the press in favor of Iran news where I live.  The only thing I've heard since was an interview with the (former?) Honduran ambassador saying everything is peachy which sounded really fake.

not really, I am apollitical 100%, people that knows me in this site knows that.

I did not even vote for him... so again you just proved your ignorance. Read other posts in this thread, seem like there is a lot of people more intelligent than you in those forums, which just makes me happy. Get your facts straight next time.

Funny thing is, here there is a minority who still uses terms as "my general" when refering to Pinochet, saying he is kind of a hero. Traces are still left of the hate that made our country explode, from both sides.

I doubt a coup would happen here again, but it seems that there are still some  people that live in the cold war, you might have seen them like 2 years ago when pinochet died crying and things like that and shouting like animals to people that dared to call him a dictator or international press that was there to cover everything. Some nazis went to the funeral too, so you figure.