MontanaHatchet said:
Yes, that's the purpose of the Off Topic section. But it's not why most people come here.
The general use of the Off-Topic section has nothing to do with its purpose, which is being fulfilled in this case.
If I wanted long debates, I'd have them over sales numbers.
You don't get to choose what discussions do or do not become debates. You want to have a light-hearted discussion?
Do not come into a topic where people are talking about a female serial rapist.
Most people come to Off Topic because they want more casual discussion, and to avoid the constant bitter arguments and trolling and fighting that take place in the other parts of the forum.
This has nothing to do with the system wars, which is primarily what the rest of the conflict of the site is about. I mean, how much Off-Topic do you actually read? This is why I don't participate in political discussions - I don't like political discussions! There are just some topics about which one can be guaranteed to be displeased. You have found another one of yours.
I wasn't getting on a pedestal to criticize them for the same thing (why you used the term soapbox is beyond me, just use the term I used).
I used "soapbox" specifically because it wasn't the term you used and it conveyed exactly what I wanted to convey. "Soapbox" is a very good word in this context.
It's not hypocritical to be annoyed when people like Kasz call other people terrible liberals for joking about rape,
Kasz said he was surprised because highwaystar was a liberal, and would not assumedly be making those kind of jokes. No, it wasn't a good thing to say, but I make no apologies for him.
as if the subject of rape showed variation among political affiliation.
This is all worded very confusingly. Now even I'm not sure I read Kasz's words correctly.
Nor is it hypocritical for me to be annoyed when he compares rape jokes to Holocaust jokes (which seems incredibly offensive)
Extreme, bordering on hyperbole, but comparing making light of one horror to making light of another isn't very out of line.
or having Dtewi going on a gigantic rant about humanity and morality (as if other species are incapable of rape).
No comment on that much, but I didn't address Dtewi's post specifically because I have no interest in arguing that point with someone who believes that.
By the way, where did you see me demand anything of anyone?
Well, right here:
If other people want to make sick jokes, let them. Stop ruining this thread with gigantic arguments about how morally upstanding you are.
Now that we have that cleared up, I-
Did I go up to other people in this thread and tell them to joke about rape? No, but I did tell other people to stop sitting around, criticizing others and holding huge debates over god-knows-what
You asked me if you had made any demands -
and then you showed me where you made a demand! (I read those debates, forgot what everyone said, and I'm not reading them again).
So you're saying that you don't really pay attention to what's written and then stop caring about what's said. I don't really get your point.
I don't think the subject of rape, or its controversy, is limited to western culture.
It's not! But I can't speak as to Eastern culture and the place of rape in the controversy hierarchy, which is why I specifically mentioned Western culture. I don't speak as to cultures that I lack all perspective on.
Talk as seriously as you want about it, but don't chastise others who want to be assholes (someone can ban them if they want, or other users can IGNORE them).
People are going to get offended about people taking rape lightly! I cannot imagine why that would surprise you.