Well actually Obama has been pitching cap-and-trade most recently (as in two days ago) as something that will stimulate jobs and research. And I've seen a fair amount of Congressman say that this will reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy and will in the long run decrease our energy costs. So I don't think it is fair to say that they aren't making those arguments.
Ironically many of the people who were most against Obama raising fuel efficiency standards in the past few months are the same ones complaining about cap-and-trade. And frankly there is no better way to directly reduce the amount of oil we have to import. You are taking money out of the hands of terrorists. Not to mention it gives Iran less bargaining chips because there economy relies so much on oil.
A pretty conservative journal even criticized them for making those arguments...so obviously they are making those arguments:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/625bhgao.asp
The 'Dependence on Foreign Oil' Canard
The worst justification yet for Obama's energy plan.
by Jeff Bergner
06/22/2009, Volume 014, Issue 38
|
As the public's enthusiasm for a major new energy tax wanes, advocates of the administration's "cap and trade" emissions proposal have found a new justification: national security. We should adopt a cap and trade energy tax, they say, because this will reduce our dependence on foreign oil and thus strengthen America's national security. It is unsurprising that national security would be the last refuge of a policy that cannot be sold on its merits. But "energy independence" is a mantra that has been around for decades, with adherents across the political spectrum. Does it really wash as a rationale for cap and trade?
|
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson