akuma587 said:
So...is your argument that simply because it is possible that we might not be responsible for global warming that we should do absolutely nothing even though it would benefit us to move away from carbon based fuels anyway? And when the alternative could potentially devestate the earth's entire ecosystem if we do decide to do nothing? That doesn't sound like a winning argument to me. |
Did you read my above post? Cause no that's not what i'm saying.
What i'm saying is that governments should be honest with their people on why the things they want to get done are good ideas, rather then scare the fuck out of them with overblown fearmongering based on incomplete computer models based on guessing and bad math.
Though yeah. If the people are given a well rationed, well explained arguement for why we should conserve fuel and energy and develop new technology and they say "No."
Then fuck it. You gave people a choice and they screwed it up.
Lieing to people on such a scale is never justified.








