jcp234 said:
Actually, you are proving my point. Why didn't the developers take advantage of the amazing blu-ray potential? Especially, considering the game is PS3 exclusive? And your threats of being "sniped" and being "banned" do not threaten me. Just something to keep in mind in the future. I appreciate the fact that Microsoft did not integrate HD-DVD or Blu-ray into the 360. Increased capacity means more resources/higher expectations...which translates to higher costs. It's good that Microsoft chose DVD. |
you don't seem to understand, what I'm saying is that blu-ray simply gives the capacity for very large games, it's simply gives the developer freedom to make what ever game they like with out needing to worry about if the game will fit or not on the disc, now weather or not a developer uses the whole disc or not depends on what type of game they are trying to make, the fact that it's 25GB on a single layer doesn't mean that the game has to be 25GB big, that's just stupid.
Infact it's quite obvious that certain 360 games would have benifited from a larger disc capacity, Blue dragon x3 DVD and lost odisy x4 DVDs, even halo 3 required x2 DVDs, also many devs have commented in the lack of space on DVD, such as ID with their game rage, and even the GTA folks. Now if the 360 had a larger disc capacity the same games would have been released but just one 1 disc and no comments regarding disc space would have even been made, and yet if that were the case, the developers would still have the same freedom as the PS3 developers when it comes to how much disc space they use and they'd only use what the see fit in regards to the game there making.









