The funniest thing about it is, Ghostbusters is a Sony Pictures owned IP, how they let someone else develop it for the competitor and then blunder the Playstation version is hilarious.

Thats because it's not "significantly" better as you claim, like most PS3 multiplatforms have been for a long time its only slightly worse and "almost unnoticeable".  This topic on the otherhand is a game that was touted as being delayed due to the 360 and the developers sang the praises of the PS3 only to release what can be described as a shambles when you compare the PS3 version to what should have been the inferior 360 version.  I don't see how you can't see why it gathered such interest, this isn't the usual mine is bigger than yours subject, its a huge cock up by the developers. 

Despite your claims to the contrary PS3 fans are definately worried about the graphics capability of their machine as its all the fans harp on about as being important, despite the fact it was proved irrelevant to success last generation.

@slowmo

ergh why would WE be worried about PS3's grfx capabilities when it has the best looking console game ever Uncharted 2 coming out this year?

Confirmed: Higher resolution is more important than a fun gameplay experience??? Damn, I guess I should throw my Wii in the trash then.

@cactus

no it looks BLURRY though!

I know exactly what the PS3 is capable of graphically....in the right hands.   These guys didn't know how to properly work with the PS3 and it shows both in the final product and in the statements they are making now.   

I'll reward this developer the way I reward all developers who do a crappy job programming for any console........I'll pick this up when it's in the bargain bin,  that way I'll be paying for the actual effort they put into making it for the console of my choice.

Yeah, I guess you and I were both in the Dark on that one.

Well that just sucks, too bad the game will sell more on PS3, given that it's exclusive in Others...

I don't usually care about these comparisons, but MAN!!! is that resolution a lot lower. These guys really are left looking a bit silly when taking into account their pre-release PS3 statements.

What engine is this game using? I am guessing a custom made one. Now, this is speculation, but maybe their engine is not so hot when it comes to scene ordering and throwing out invisible areas and they are dealing with bad overdraw. In pixel heavy situations, the PS3 can struggle with fill-rate and maybe that is causing the problem here. The 360 with it's stream processor like architecture would handle "bad" engines better I think (I am waiting for the backlash for that statement).

Quality engines made by Epic and ID shouldn't be underestimated.

Oh common, that's slogan #12 from the SDF's book of trolling.. You guys have been here long enough to know that!