By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - FORZA 3 is the new graphics king

ironman said:
Meh, I don't think that shifting animation is all that important. it's such a small thing to be complaining about.

 

It's not important if you never drive with manual.



Around the Network
kanariya said:
ironman said:
Meh, I don't think that shifting animation is all that important. it's such a small thing to be complaining about.

 

It's not important if you never drive with manual.

Even if you drive manual. it's just a little quirky thing that most people will not totice because they are focused on playing the game. This is something I have no doubt that a few 360 fanboys would try to rub in your face if it were GT5's "problem" what would you say then? Thats a rhetorical question because I doubt you would be honest here in lue of the fact that it would destroy your argument.



Past Avatar picture!!!

Don't forget your helmet there, Master Chief!

Different people weights different things differently.



AE86 said:
selnor said:
 

Well then it's not strictly correct on the whole simulation thing. Becasue if the car is manual only, it should not have the option to select Automatic. It's very simple, for immersion reasons. If you don't physically change gear on the controller it shouldn't portray any physical movement on the animation. Because that takes the immersion away.

It's the same as the people who play with a steering wheel and use the cockpit mode. Having 2 steering wheels in front of you takes the immersion away. They should use the hood mode for more realism and immersion.

IT's all about player input, not the selective car your driving.


That is completely ridiculous. Why not remove optional traction control from all cars that don't have it? Why not remove the suggested racing lines on the on the road? Those don't exist in real life. Hell, why don't we push it even further and remove camber adjustment for cars that weren't built with camber kits?

Why would you alienate millions of players and remove a feature that has been in almost every racing game ever? This is still a business, and these are still video games, not reality simulators from the year 2045. I think you're just embarassed that you didn't know about this already.

It's going to be funny when Forza ends up using the same system as GT5:P, I'll be sure to quote this insane post.

You should really ease up. Immersion is the most important thing to me in a driving game. Some PC sims have got it right. GTR2 especially. Immersion is so important. IF I don't physically change gear, then the fake hands on the screen shouldn't. Simples. That's immersion. I'm sorry you cant accept that immersion is important to some people. And the things you talk about removing are able to turn off of people who want to be immersed. However the animation of gear changing cannot not be changed.



selnor said:

You should really ease up. Immersion is the most important thing to me in a driving game. Some PC sims have got it right. GTR2 especially. Immersion is so important. IF I don't physically change gear, then the fake hands on the screen shouldn't. Simples. That's immersion. I'm sorry you cant accept that immersion is important to some people. And the things you talk about removing are able to turn off of people who want to be immersed. However the animation of gear changing cannot not be changed.

I was going to give up on you, but it seems you have already given up on yourself.

You should take a step back and actually read what you're saying, you've lost it.



Around the Network
kanariya said:
Different people weights different things differently.


Yes, but you are acting like the game is terrible just because some ingame character is not shifting gears. That's a little petty don't you think?



Past Avatar picture!!!

Don't forget your helmet there, Master Chief!

You're too sensitive. I said it's really good to have but doesn't kill if it doesn't have it.
You should just learn to take comments easily.

Maybe you should direct your comments to selnor.



kanariya said:
You're too sensitive. I said it's really good to have but doesn't kill if it doesn't have it.
You should just learn to take comments easily.

Maybe you should direct your comments to selnor.

lol, I'm too sensative? Your the one talking about how a game is unrealistic because the incar character is not shifting. That's kinda silly.



Past Avatar picture!!!

Don't forget your helmet there, Master Chief!

ironman said:
kanariya said:
You're too sensitive. I said it's really good to have but doesn't kill if it doesn't have it.
You should just learn to take comments easily.

Maybe you should direct your comments to selnor.

lol, I'm too sensative? Your the one talking about how a game is unrealistic because the incar character is not shifting. That's kinda silly.

 

Quote me saying that lol.

 

I think you mixed me up with selnor.



kanariya said:
ironman said:
kanariya said:
You're too sensitive. I said it's really good to have but doesn't kill if it doesn't have it.
You should just learn to take comments easily.

Maybe you should direct your comments to selnor.

lol, I'm too sensative? Your the one talking about how a game is unrealistic because the incar character is not shifting. That's kinda silly.

 

Quote me saying that lol.

 

I think you mixed me up with selnor.

Perhaps, but you are still defending his position, could one not assume that you both held the same veiwpoint?



Past Avatar picture!!!

Don't forget your helmet there, Master Chief!