So will you tell me, in what possible context, other than the one you've used in the OP, is "fuck off and get a life" NOT insulting?

As for your OP: "Seriously wish these people would fuck off and get a life, if Valve listen to these people and this game gets changed in any way shape or form I'll be pissed."

Saying "fuck off and get a life" to "these people" vs. a specific person is both still rude and bad behavior, at least that's how my parents, elders, teachers, and friends taught me. I'll never say "fuck off and get a life" to someone I want to be friends with (or maintain my friendship with), and I'll rather say it to people who I don't like, and frankly, are jerks in the first place.

Grow up, who said Valve isn't delivering its promises?

I never played, L4D, nor buy Valve games, but from that fan video, and what I heard from Adam Sessler (I think), it seems like Valve has yet to deliver on their promise and seems to have no reason to do so with L4D2 coming out.

Since I'm only hearing one side of the argument, especially after watching an potentially biased video, will you please give me Valve's side of the story seece?

I don't have "Valves side of the story" I'm not jumping to any conclusions, Valve could completly stop support for L4D. I don't think they will. I think they can continue support for the 2. Say they bring out a brand new mode for L4D2, how hard would it be to include that mode as DLC for free to L4D users?

I agree with you that it's too early to say if Valve will completely stop support for L4D2. However, I thinkt he hardcore fan's fears are that because L4D2 seems, to them, an attempt to get some cheap money, why will they give content from L4D2 to L4D? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of buying L4D2 and reduce their profits (which hardcore fans believe is now their utmost main concern) if there's no real incentive to buy L4D2? While they could only give some things from L4D2 and leave the rest to be exclusive for the sequel, wouldn't that mean a good portion of L4D2 will essentially be in L4D1? Or on the converse, if there isn't so much content on L4D2 coming to L4D, wouldn't that give credence to the hard core fan's argument that Valve isn't delivering on their promises of DLC and added content (or more specificly, a lot of it?)

And isn't the crux of the hard core fan's logic and outrage is why L4D2 is necessary and why Valve has been spending so much time on developing L4D2, instead of using that time to make the promised content for L4D?

I don't know what system they would use. Delayed DLC for L4D fans, L4D2 isn't going to be a complete carbon copy of L4D, there is evena  complete new AI. The incentive is a brand new game.

"I don't understand what someone directly saying "fuck off and get a life" to someone would be. You clearly didn't finish your statement. You should take time to re-read your posts and not rush them, or at least clarify it via edit or a subsequent post..."

I read back my sentance and its how it should be.

No, the crux of the hardcore fan's argument was that Valve has spent time developing a new game, instead of making DLC for L4D. And what would be the purpose of buying and playing L4D2 if there's going to be DLC, when there's a new game out? And if they instead, refuse to buy the new game, isn't it back to square one (boycotting the game)?

Both ways there little incentive to buy either games... The first one little DLC, and when the new game comes out, there'll be new DLC for the old one? And if there's no DLC for the old game, then why would you trust/support a company who will release an incomplete game?

And I think that the whole hardcore rage goes beyond L4D, but goes to the root of the PC vs Console gamer mistrust and backlash for every PC centric developer that moves on to the console (Bethesda for e.g. for how Deus Ex 2 came out when it was made for the Xbox in mind, instead of the PC [God, Deus Ex was awesome...])

No, the crux of the hardcore fan's argument was that Valve has spent time developing a new game, instead of making DLC for L4D. And what would be the purpose of buying and playing L4D2 if there's going to be DLC, when there's a new game out? And if they instead, refuse to buy the new game, isn't it back to square one (boycotting the game)?

Both ways there little incentive to buy either games... The first one little DLC, and when the new game comes out, there'll be new DLC for the old one? And if there's no DLC for the old game, then why would you trust/support a company who will release an incomplete game?

And I think that the whole hardcore rage goes beyond L4D, but goes to the root of the PC vs Console gamer mistrust and backlash for every PC centric developer that moves on to the console (Bethesda for e.g. for how Deus Ex 2 came out when it was made for the Xbox in mind, instead of the PC [God, Deus Ex was awesome...])