A pretty creative lot here. Somehow we managed to wedge a Bush and Republican party bash in there, particularly the former of which we rarely get enough of these days. Sorry, but if you don't find gay porn a tad disturbing then maybe you get around too much.

Edit - And more on topic... this guy has no discretionary gene apparently. Who could think up this idea and then decide hey I should act on that? I hope to humanity that it's only Jack Thompson.

PlagueOfLocust: An aspect of human sexuality disturbing to some who don't share in it? Shocking! Can't blame you for it, but realistically, your nun fetish, it's FUCKING CREEPY. Jesus dude. Get the point?

Anyhow, there is a good reason not to vote for Hilary Clinton: She once supported Jack Thompson. If I supported someone on the Mental Level of Charles Manson, I think there may be some question of my judgement!* Everyone makes mistakes, but there's the teenage pregnancy mistake, and then there's the setting a hospital on fire because you wanted to cook hot dogs and there wasn't a free microwave mistake. There are some mistakes that you really have no excuse for.

*Canadian, once more breaking Canadian Law. Vote for who you want with your own informed decisions. Merely a reason why I would not vote for her. You can agree or disagree at your leisure.

See my sig, thats who im voting for and hopefully a good amount of everyone else does. Look him up he is quite agreeable.

My nun fetish is perfectly natural, thank you. And bad point: there are plenty of fetishes that I don't enjoy personally that don't actually disturb me either, perhaps most. Of course the argument IS whether or not homosexuality is a natural "aspect of human sexuality" or a perversion thereof... lumping it in with fetishes is only fair in the case of unnatural fetishes (which my nun fetish is not). But we aren't likely to see eye to eye on that larger argument, so let's not even try. Let the gays do their gay thing, because they're going to. Just don't take pictures and put them on your bumper. But those nuns.... oh do put those pictures on your bumper, I'm simply beggin' ya.

Are you telling me that homosexuality, something that does naturally occur, and has over the history of time, even in places without nuns, is more unnatural than a desire to sleep with those oh so chaste women which would be culturally founded moreso than inborn? I dunno, you're stepping into "WTF" territory here. There's absolutely no reason for you to support it, participate in it, view it, or like it, but to call it unnatural, well, you've got a prostrate for a reason, and it ain't just to get cancer or swell up and make it difficult to pee.

Though, technical point which I hate - Fetish technically is something that one cannot achieve sexual gratification without. It's common use is quite different from the technical use, but few who say they have a bondage fetish actually need to be hanging from a ceiling to enjoy themselves.

Yes, your technical point doesn't really contribute. But interesting.

"...homosexuality, something that does naturally occur" That part I like. I like how something that "occurs" must, therefore, be natural. Murder must be natural, or at least we should think of it in a positive light (not comparing murder to homosexuality in terms of severity; just highlighting your logical error). Even better: "even in places without nuns", as if your point is that somehow homosexuality is more natural than a nun fetish because homosexuality existed before nun-fetishes. (It's as human as apple-pie, by golly!) Aside from that not making sense, since a nun-fetish obviously wouldn't exist before nuns... there have always been men, so that's why homosexuality occurred at any given point in history. Again, occurrence does not prove naturality. And neither does desire, since there are unnatural desires.

I'm well out of WTF territory. I wouldn't commit to an argument I couldn't reasonably defend.

Your nun fetish is natural, just uncommon.

Weirdness is defined mainly by how unusual it is for something to occur, homosexuality occurs in a fairly large portion of society (one in ten is it?) and as such while often shunned by hetrosexuals (as they make up a larger portion of society) is not considered as weird as other sexual desires such as bondage and pedophilia.

As such your nun fetish would be considered by most people to be weirder than homosexuality as its less common.

I sent him a PM to continue our discussion in private rather than public, basically because I can talk a lot about Nun fetishes and homosexuality, and few people want to read that. This topic is about Jack Thompson and homosexuality, not nuns! He's not a nun.

hi my name is Jack*insert random porn pic* and i would like*porn picture* to tell you about he moral plague*porn video* that is video games*nun making love to donkey*

I'm just surprised he didn't make his son download it.