nordlead said:
disolitude said:
I dont know. To me presentation means a lot for a conference like this, and I don't think im a shallow gamer (whatever that is)
Like Sony looked like they didn't know what thye were doing. Jack Trenton was sweating like crazy, the motion control guys were nervous and shaking, KAz Harai was arrogant and looked like he didnt give a shit...
Nintendo I think had a more composed conference than Sony which was all over the place.
Sony had lots of content, but like I said they screwed up with presentation...For motion controls demo they did, the following analogy works best "if you stick your dick in a pudding, no one is really going to eat it...even if its the best pudding around."
|
while presentation is important, as you need to get your point across clearly and effectively, bringing in celebrities does nothing for me in terms of showing off how good a game is.
|
Sure it does. I am watchign a conference for an hour and a half or more...I want to be entertained. Company can show the best games ever, but if the whole experience is boring...the whole "Lets look at this slide now" approach, I will most likely find the conference to be meh hence the games won't look as amazing as they should.
Sony showed some wicked stuff, but they really need to get CEO's and presenters that are good at public speaking.
Nintendo presentation was quite stiff as well. Its like they had que cards they were reading from.
Kudos to Microsoft for keeping Don Mattick away from the presentation until the last 30 mins. He is not the most personable person around...if you know what I mean.