| twesterm said:
There are gray areas to people such as being gay. That is not a clear right or wrong to everyone and people can argue either side until the cows come home.
With piracy, it's flat out stealing, and this isn't the type of stealing that you can use the old would you steal bread to feed your family argument because while food is a necessity, gaming isn't. Piracy is stealing and that's really all there is to it. It doesn't matter if you (general you, not you cdude) think it's right or not wrong, it just is.
Is it alright for me to rape someone because I think it's not wrong?
Also, I'm not going to get until into the piracy is not stealing argument if you don't intend to buy, this isn't the thread for that argument.
|
Piracy is not stealing though. It is the closest easily referenced analogue, but that is not the true crime at work here. It is a denial of funding rather than taking someone's property. Pirating a game does not directly cost anyone anything. Everything that belonged to the victim of the crime is still theirs which causes a gray area to pop up. I know you likely are foaming at the mouth right now, but hear me out.
Out of print games are the gray area in all of this. I will admit I have had to resort to this more than a few times. A lot of the times I have aquired games I already owned, and loved but the disc became un-usable for whatever reasons. In order to get those games back I have to support other people who probably never owned the game. Further I have been the person who never owned the old games. I cannot possibly offer my money to any of the people involved.
I ask you, who is the victim in the above scenario? None of the developers or publishers have any income coming from these games. In many cases the developers have closed up shop much to my dismay. Is having their work out there in the ether a terrible crime? I can say with certainty that in once case (Masters of Orion 2) when a developer heard about an active community still playing his game he was thrilled. The fact that a game well over a decade old still had a fan following despite a sequel made him feel pretty good over all, and for understandable reasons. It is a great compliment to his skills.
Yes there are clear areas with piracy. Anything remotely in-print, or even commonly sold at stores will cause some harm. Used games sales suck, but at least they tell retailers which games will be popular and give them a better estimate for how many copies of a game to initially order. Eventually though the games disapear, or become so rare that no substantial data can be gained from watching their sales. At that point pirating stops being a crime of any consequence. Until it can be clearly seen when that point hits, piracy will have a very large gray area for what is or is not ok.