kanariya said:
Lol. I didn't know the Porchse was built like a tank. |
lol no.
i meant at 0:45 the driver yells out in pain in 1st video. its hillarious. watch it again lol.
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
We should start up a Gran Turismo fanclub to show our true numbers 
| Leonidus said: We should start up a Gran Turismo fanclub to show our true numbers |
Good idea just post there. Not here because you made this thread utterly cringeworthy.
nojustno said:
Good idea just post there. Not here because you made this thread utterly cringeworthy. |
After reading your post three times, I still dont understand what your saying :0
selnor said:
I played and liked GT series. It's not the best though. Recent years have seen GT as not even a AAA title. 90+ Meta is pretty much what this site refers to as AAA game. GT4 = 89 Meta. GT HD Concept = 82 Meta. GT5P = 80 Meta So The series currently hasnt been AAA since GT3. I like the games, but there is better on the market. Forza 1 GT4's direct competition scored 92 Meta. Forza 2 = 90 Meta. I refuse to go with fanboy nonsense it's the be all end all racing game. Even Critics have called the last full game and last 2 half games below 9/10.
|
OMG! The last full game that was on the weakest system power wise last gen was 1 point shy of 90 which Forza 2 scored on it's second game.
Look at Gameranking. It is just 0.07% away from being rounded up to the ninety percentile. The other games are both demos. One is free so you can't complain and the other is a large demo but still a full game. Critics are also going to hold a higher standard for such a praised and well known game. By doing this it will suffer harsher drops in scores if it fails to deliver the quality the brand is known for.
| PS2 | Gran Turismo 4 Polyphony Digital/SCEA, 2005 |
89.43% 87 Reviews |
FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."
Basically if we are to beleive in history is the only undeniable truth then these scores show that GT Prolouges or Concepts have never scored above 90 Gameranking/Meta. Actually GTP5 is the highest scoring of the retail full game demos as people call it. :P
I will take a bet with anyone that GT5 will score no lower than 92% overall. Anyone care to take me up on it? We can also change the terms slightly if you want.
 |
PS3 | Gran Turismo HD Concept Polyphony Digital/SCEA, 2006 |
85.00% 5 Reviews |
 |
PS3 | Gran Turismo 5 Prologue Polyphony Digital/SCEA, 2008 |
79.88% 64 Reviews |
 |
PS2 | Gran Turismo Concept 2001 Tokyo Polyphony Digital/SCEI, 2002 |
76.11% 18 Reviews |
 |
PS2 | Gran Turismo Concept 2002 Tokyo-Geneva Polyphony Digital/SCEE, 2002 |
75.71% 7 Reviews |
 |
PS2 | Gran Turismo 4 Prologue Polyphony Digital/SCEA, 2004 |
68.83% 6 Reviews |
FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."
waron said:
GT5p works in 1280x1080 - so it's not Full HD at all. and yes those Shift Screenshots ARE ingame. yeah it's hard to believe for GT fanboys to see somehing that looks way better than Gran Turismo and not only will be released earlier but also have quite nice damage system. makes me wonder how come EA could pull better looking game in less than 2 years from GT5p when PD was working on it for about 5 years and in 2 years they still could manage to make damage system unlike PD. yeah i'm not fan of Polyphony Digital for the crap they are doing and how they treat their own clients. |
Links please. And thanks for those videos, they truly show the "impressive" damage avaliable in Shift... *note sarcasm*
Leonidus said:
After reading your post three times, I still dont understand what your saying :0
|
Hes saying that hes a fanboy and he doesn't understand your humor.
Don't confuse this guy with the carl dude even though they have almost the same avatar.
Regarding the videos of shift.. it looks pretty good.. but 3s words. Ray Traced Shadows !..
Check out my game about moles ^
Feylic said:
Links please. And thanks for those videos, they truly show the "impressive" damage avaliable in Shift... *note sarcasm*
|
http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-76181.aspx
Isn't it funny how every single graphics thread Selnor makes turns into a 100+ post mud slinging fest?
You can always tell a Selnor thread; cherry-picked pictures to make the 360 exclusives look the best, multiplatforms somewhere in the middle, and PS3 exclusives look like shit. HILARIOUS metacritic comparisons. The words "best looking game", "AAA", and "metacritic" are thrown around constantly, Selnor makes tons of statements that he knows are ridiculous and wrong and hopes nobody notices, then he ignores people who call him out on it because he knows he can't defend himself. The thread usually ends (after about 200 posts) with Selnor half admitting he was wrong at some point, and everybody ends up slightly angrier than they were before.
Selnor you really have to cool it on the fanboyism, maybe if you did then 90% of the thread wouldn't devoted to people laughing at you for making such ludicrous statements.
Although I must admit, these threads are entertaining. I laughed so hard when I saw you compared the metacritics of Forza 1 to GT4....If thats not the definition of cherry picking then I don't know what is.
I say we lock every single graphics thread (or every thread period) created by Selnor in the future, and instead have him pass the idea on to an unbiased person and have that person create said thread.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
