AE86 said:
selnor said:
Actually Mr AE86 I ignored you. Why? Because anyone on here can see with half a brain that your fanboyism is brimming with quality.
Isnt't it funny that every single graphics thread AE86 enters turns into 360 cant do that?
You can always tell when AE86 has entered the thread; He tries to disregard ANY 360 shot that looks remotely close or better than KZ2, Uncharted,GT5P or MGS4. HILARIOUS metacriticphobia strikes whenever a Playstation game is not doing well there, but mysteriously as many others do, wont mention the use of Metacritics if it shows PS3 games in good light. The words "best looking game", "AAA", and "metacritic" are thrown around constantly when a PS3 exclusive does well, and AE86 makes tons of accusations because he knows he did the same thing at school when little joe billy disagreed which flavour ice cream was the best. These threads usually end (after about 200 posts) with AE86 getting a few laughs from his PS3 following chums NEVER admitting he was wrong at some point, and everybody ends up slightly angrier than they were before.
AE86 you really have to cool it on the fanboyism, maybe if you did then 90% of the thread wouldn't BE devoted to people laughing at you for making such ludicrous statements.
Although I must admit, these posts are entertaining. I laughed so hard when I saw you say the metacritics of Forza 1 to GT4 was laughable. It's the only logical way to comapre the 2 games. Let me guess you would compare Killzone 2 to Doom 2? LOL
I say we lock every single post (or every thread period) created by AE86 in the future, and instead have him pass the idea on to an unbiased person and have that person create said thread. That way the PS3 bias would be one less.:)
|
Terrible, just terrible.
1. I have a 360 and I enjoy it quite a bit.
2. I don't make threads.
3. I never argued graphics in this thread. I only made a wager which apparently people aren't willing to accept because they know as well as I do that Shift won't look as good as GT5:P when its released on consoles.
4. Use of metacritic is fine, when comparisons are done properly (i.e. not what you do)
5. I don't think I've ever said best looking game and I rarely use the term AAA.
6. My fanboyism is brimming with quality? WTF does that mean?
7. I don't think theres ever been a thread devoted to people laughing at me. You on the other hand...
8. Forza 1 and GT4 is the only logical way to compare the games? WTF!
A. You pick the first game out of a series and pit it against the fourth.
B. You don't pick the latest version of Forza, but you do pick the latest full version of GT.
C. You pick the highest scoring game from the Forza camp, and the lowest scoring full game from the GT camp.
Nothing logical about that, just pure fanboyism.
|
I did what you did and pulled Sh*t from my arse. People dont comment on your posts because you go along with the crowd. ( PS3 crowd going by 100% of your posts ). I'm individual, so I couldnt give a toss what you and the PS3 community think.
Forza 1 2005, GT4 2005.
Forza 2 2007
GT5P 2008. But thats not fair to you either as GT5P is half a game. So it's 80 Meta I didnt use.
So yes Forza 1 2005 against GT4 2005 is very fair. Also GT1-3 had no competition, so those 3 games were able to score whatever they wanted. They are no longer alone. So will be scored as such. Take a step back from your GT fanboyism.
As I said before and this applies to you massively.
AE86 says "Not everyone believes what you believe Selnor"
Selnor says " My beliefs dont require them to."
Now how about you jump off that 10ft horse your riding, your not a King my friend. :)
