Dark_Rulez89 said:
BMaker11 said:
AussieGecko said:
BMaker11 said:
rckrz6 said: Its funny you don't hear the same garbage on microsoft's side |
Because it wouldn't be true?
|
Decided not to jump on the original comment till i got one of these, um actually if a developer decided to base a game directly around the 360's console, using minimum the graphics card to its full potential, the ps3 and "teh core" would have a hell of a time try to match it. The crysis demo was probably the best example of this. The developers said that the 360 could do certain bits better, and the ps3 could do other bits better, unless the ps3 was better alround then yes in fact there is things that the 360 can do and the ps3 cannot.
It works both ways.
Minus your fanboyism out of this and you will see
|
Umm...the biggest technical game on the 360 is Gear of War 2...and the Unreal Engine runs on the PS3. Try again
|
Unreal engine and the PS3 don't get along too well they always run problems when putting UE on the PS3..Case and point The last remnant.
|
I agree that Unreal engine doesn't seem to mesh well with PS3 (although given its an engine that started life exclusively for PCs perhaps that shouldn't be a surprise). However UT3 looks / plays great on PS3, so I have to wonder how much is down to the engine and how much is down to the developer - i.e. Epic, who of course will understand the engine's guts better than any developer who licences it, seemed perfectly able to get it to run fine on PS3, while developers who licence it seem to struggle.
OT a little more - I wish all these 'only possible' comments would stop. Although if he's talking about processing power I suspose he could have a point