ubuntu 9.04 in my desktop

its fast and really good

Dual booting Ubuntu 9.04 and Tiny Vista. Will replace Tiny Vista with Win7RC soon.

Using Ubuntu 9.04. I find Fedora makes much bigger changes between versions and the repositories aren't as complete. (Especially the difficulty of keeping binary drivers up to date). I hav't used it for a few years though. May try Suse on a virtual machine at some point and mabye switch to it eventually. I dual boot the free vista I get from school for gaming.

Ubuntu 9.04 right now.

Been using almost all ubuntu distro since 4.10.
Used Foresight Linux for some time. Linux mint too.
Before Ubuntu, I used a lot of distros. Redhat, Fedora, Suse, OpenSuse, Gentoo, Arch, Debian (still my favourite for custom systems and servers), Slack, Mandrake...

I even took part to the creation of a distro: Nasgaïa. Now (almost) dead.

If I dual boot, it would be between Linux distros.

I'm a little disappointed by Ubuntu 9.04, the changes from 8.10 are little, the notification system, while shiny is not so great...
So I may try Fedora or OpenSuse soon.

Fedora user here, I like the "bleeding edge with a human face" philosophy underlying it :)

In the past I've been a user of Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware, Vector, Suse, Redhat and - very briefly - Gentoo.

When a friend asks for a no-fuss distro to test Linux, I point them to Ubuntu. When I have to set up a server for serious reasons, it's either Debian or CentOS.

I just went to fedora website, and seen new version is out in 13 days (26th of May).

I guess I'll try this one.

I use Ubuntu 8.04 and ordered a 9.04 CD like a week ago. Its runs great on a P4 2.8Ghz with a mere 512MB of Ram and a 250GIG HD.

I'd have Fedora installed right now if only my WLAN adapter would have working drivers. Yeah, I also looked a bit into ndiswrapper but seemed too much work, having to switch between Windows and Linux just to see some instruction from the internet.

But once I don't have to use WLAN anymore, I'll probably install Fedora again. It just seems the most suitable distirubution to be. Not too little work but not too much either; not too simple and not too hard. Ubuntu seemed a bit simple and Gentoo sounds like a lot of work. And I'm not sure if I exactly like Novell and OpenSUSE. And Debian... I don't know, considered it for a while but I'm not sure if I want anything Debian-based, don't know why though.

Oh, and the only thing keeping me from using Linux as my primary system is that games don't support Linux very well. Well, at least id, one of my favourite devs, does. I just hope Rage will support Linux too. The death of our current x86 architecture could probably help Linux quite a bit as it would be a huge thing to Microsoft - a terribly bad thing, that is.

I have Mandriva 2009 spring edition on both my laptop and my pc. I also have a slimmed down custom version of XP on my PC which I use soley as a kind of gaming console. Hardly anything else installed to keep it running fast and all other things are run from Mandriva (says Gazz whom is currently typing this on FF in XP because he wants to play)

I generally use Centos, but that said I skip the GUI and do mostly servers, and ssh into the machines from a windows client... If I wanted to use a GUI, I might install Fedora or Ubuntu or just stick with Centos for consistency.