Fixed for you, my brotha.

Still waiting on some actual proof that the PS3 sells better in big cities, as everything I've seen shows the 360 sells better and is more popular.  Hollywood loves BLURAY.

Lol left that WIDE open for me to pwn.

I'm sorry, I didn't know you had been to the future to see the amount, date, and impact of the PS3 price cut.  Don't give your opinion as fact.

Also, the 360 is said to respond to price cuts so one price cut will again not help the PS3.  The PS3 will always be in last in the US and all the momentum will continue to be stollen by the 360 until the market is saturated and the PS3 will not have any more chances.  By the time the PS3 is mass market $200 the next gen will have started and the 360/Wii will have saturated the American market.

I agree with squillam, PS3 is doing pretty terribly in the States at the moment, and we still dont know when will the rumoured price cut arrive and will it have any pernament impact (in my opinion, it will have tiny, just like GC and Xbox Impacts had in relations to PS2) it will provide a short term boost but nothin major compared to what is needed (and what did 360 achieve last holidays). PS3 simply is not popular in the states and thats a fact, 6 years of sales sound pretty realistic. I overall think that PS3 might struggle to outsell lifetime sales of PSP , because PSP recovered well in Japan.

I want all consoles to do well, but Future in the States for PS3 looks grim.

Thats what I believe. Does anyone have any good reason to counter that without referencing a 10 year plan?

Retailers and consumers decide how long something remains on the shelves. So if there are next generation consoles competing for shelf space, that shelf space is only going to come out of the lowest selling consoles alotment. It happens every time a generation switch over occours, and there has never been a precedent where 2-3 next generation and 2-3 current generation consoles have been sold at the same time at retail. So why would we face anything different if the same basic reasons behind this are the same? Since the PS3 is the lowest selling console, it will be the first to get kicked to the curb.

You make absolutely no sense at all.  If that is true then explain the PS2.  Plus it is also the company that makes the systems that decide also not just the retailers and consumers.  The orginal xbox was decided by mircosoft to take it off the shelves not the retailers and consumers.  If the orginal xbox was still on shelves, I bet you it would still be selling. 

HuH?  I thought we were talking about consoles not HD formats.... And again, you still post no evidence.  Just making radical claims to try and help your PS3.  Sorry but every region in America prefers the 360.

Oops..I am indeed sorry for having u not invited to the future...Well it doesn't matter any more as u know the inevitable can't be changed. U're talking as if 360 had been having the greatest market share among console competition. Have u ever considered about the 10 year plan Sony has been emphasising upon?..they aren't joking. All 360's got so far was the year one head start and holiday 2008 to increase the gap margin to 8.1 mn. Can they afford another price cut?. I don't think so after MS's technology department posted their losses even after strong 360 sales,..http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/976/976039p1.html. Even the idea of another console to succeed it lies under the dagger's threat.

I feel amused at how even after RROD  and E74 or whatever failures, Americans still stuck to this console. Well as far as things concern my interest I am supporting PS3's sales pace even upon market saturation. The $200 PS3 will be the real bet.