mrstickball said:
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.
Sure, while you are in the middle of a war you let people have weapons in occupied territory. Show me one country who did that.
Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 (Translated to English)
From Wikipedia: Regulations on Weapons Ownership, which declared that "all firearms, as well as all kinds of firearms ammunition, are to be surrendered immediately."[2] Under the regulations, anyone found in possession of a firearm or ammunition was subject to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 marks.> So this was actually the situation before, the 1938 law. The 1938 law made it actually easier to acquire guns - not harder. Just to disprove your occupied territory point, why do think the "Regulations on Weapons Ownership" was declared 1919? Does a bell ring? By the way the under 18 part is ridiculous, because it was over 21 before the 1938 act.
Hitler also banned firearms in Nazi-occupied territories during the war. For example, Holland after conquest: The Holland Poster banning guns (click for closeup). Citizens had 24 hours to surrender all firearms to the Nazis or face the death penalty. Printed in German on the left and Flemish on the right. For translation, see below. From Die Deutsche Wochenschau, May 15, 1940. (Photo by Moser + Rosié, Berlin)
(quoted from here)
Again in a war you won't give any weapons to your fresh occupied enemy. That's not Nazi logic, but common sense. Did the USA allow guns in Vietnam? I guess not.
Hitler wanted an armed Nazi population, thus offering training to Hitler Jugend, while banning firearm ownership of Jews and occupied territories. Not really consistent with an armed populace...Only armed people that were willing to die for Hitler. Off course he wanted an armed Nazi population. Therefore Nazi-party-members (about 10 % of the populace at that time, highpoint about 12-13%) where freed from getting a permission to bear arms. But all the others (except for Jews= 0,9 % of the populace, Sinti, Roma (0,04%) and known communist or socialists), where allowed to get a permission to get one. Again they weren't allowed to get one before due to the contract of Versailles and the following "Regulations on Weapons Ownership" from 1919. |











