mrstickball said: I never said science was a faith. But that is what the atheist puts their faith in.
You can create a religion of virtually anything. For example, I live near Ohio State University. For some people, Ohio State football (go Bucks!) is a religion for some people. It has it's own rules, code of conduct, ceremonies, leaders, and all kinds of stuff.
May I ask you this: Is Buddhism a religion? What separates it's dogma between it and atheism? Both are still set patterns of belief, both putting faith in specific things.
If you had 10 atheists in a room, and I asked them if they believed in evolution, what would they say? Would all 10 have a totally different opinion if evolution was indeed true? Each atheist may be loosely affiliated, but there are still quite a few bonds between each other. |
I don't "believe" in science or have "faith" in science. I believe various things that come out of the scientific method. but I don't pray to science, I don't leave my life up to science any more than any religious person does.
The difference between buddhism and atheism is that buddhists have a large set of traditions they observe, ceremonies, religious leaders, a belief that one must act in a particular way. Things atheism does not have.
You can create a religion out of most anything, but you still have to create it. Correlation doesn't make a religion. Millions of people all over the planet eat eggs for breakfeast, these people also believe that the earth rotates around the sun, they also do crossword puzzles, and they prefer cats over dogs. Is this a religion because you can make a correlation between them?
There is no atheist code of conduct, or ceremony, or acknowledged leaders, and all "kinds of stuff". If atheism is a religion then anything you think is a religion.