neerdowell said:
The Ghost of RubangB said: I am an unfailingly loyal member of the hardcore of the casual gaming movement.
I don't believe that a hardcore exists, but I do find it amusing that you're claiming to be hardcore while admitting you haven't beaten a single Mario game. |
I think you might have missed the point a little; the whole idea was to attribute hardcore gaming to an actual measurable metric that makes sense rather than attributing it to playing a particular type of game (such as Mario, Halo, shooters in general, games that sell well and are hyped as the end-all-be-all, online gaming...). This means that even those who own a wii, which is usually considered casual could by this definition be considered hardcore.
You on the other hand somewhat argued in favor of those that consider the Wii casual by defining my lack of hardcoreness simply because I don't care much for Mario. You've applied the exact same reasoning that defines Wii as casual simply because of the games that are available.
|
It was a joke. Mario games are easy, and you've played several of them, so I figured you would've completed one by now.
I don't believe in hardcore gaming, and I think the harder you try to define it, the vaguer it will become.
Look at it this way: we were all non-gamers when we picked up our first game. We were lucky enough (some of us anyway) to have started gaming before there were a bunch of whiny haters who thought we were a threat when we started playing.
If you have kids, and they enjoy games, but only 1% as much as you do, are you going to call them casuals and tell them they're not as hardcore as you? I'd rather say "welcome to the party" and give them Tetris.