senseinobaka said: Well alot of people mention Nintendo. In my opinion nintendo actually does the opposite to an extreme. A franchise game like Mario, Zelda, Kirby, Metriod, or even Smash Brothers, are rarely release (about once a generation).
BUT they over expose their characthers by placing them into other games like Mario Party or Mario and Sonic at the Olympics. Pretty much any nintendo character can be whored out anywhere at any time and very cheaply.
This isnt what I'm talking about in this thread. What sony does is make a franchise game almost once a year... Imagine nintendo making Smash Brothers every year. Imagine if we had as many Mario Galaxy games since 2006 as we did Resistance games. That would be a problem. |
Oh so you are complaining about how Sony works hard at making complete games which are sequels of an existing franchise.
They also happen to be of a very high quality and give the user base a bigger collection to choose from.
According to you it would be better if Sony started making generic party shovelware with the franchise characters used over and over again.
I can imagine "Naughty Dog Kung Fu" with Nathan Drake and Jak and Dexter fighting each other.
or maybe they should be like MS and have all games set in either the Halo or the Gears universe. And then have saturation publicity from highway billboards to comic book covers blaring out the name of the franchise.
Everybody is overusing their established franchises, I am just happy the way Sony is doing it by actually making good solid stand alone games.