im happy wiht my ps3
I'm curious as to how many 360's out there have failed and how many PS3's out there have failed. My guess, if you take a little less than one third of the 360's current units, the PS3 would have less defective units.
Pixel Art can be fun.
S.T.A.G.E. said: Mircosofts system last gen was the most superior console. |
Careful. I think you might want to rephrase that. The XBOX was the most powerful console hardwarewise? True. The superior console? Total opinion.
yo_john117 said:
So there you go a whole year ago the failure rate was about 16.4% That was before the new chip which would further decrease failure rates :) So looks like my 5-12% is probably spot on. Thank you for proving me right.
|
You really didn't bother yourself to read the whole post? It says 16% OUT OF 1040 Xbox 360s,
''171 were "disabled", of these 171 units 60% failed due to a general hardware failure
That's even worse
BladeOfGod said:
You really didn't bother yourself to read the whole post? It says 16% OUT OF 1040 Xbox 360s,
''171 were "disabled", of these 171 units 60% failed due to a general hardware failure That's even worse |
umm yeah they tested 1040 xbox to see what the fail rate was and 16% of them failed...so yeah looks like i was right.
Dude get over yourself, RROD is not very widespread any more.
Saying that its above 25% is about as stupid as saying the PS3 has no games...so if you believe that the 360 has a fail rate of above 25% you must still believe that the PS3 has no games.
BOTH of those stupid fanboy beliefs need to die RIGHT THE FUCK NOW!!!
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Stop being so neglectful to memory. Mircosofts system last gen was the most superior console. You blindly act like they cannot deliver quality when you know they can. You look at their mad rush this gen as if it's all they ever did and all they can do. |
I'm not saying that they haven't made good quality machines, I'm saying the mission statement they publicly announced was to force a company out the industry, not do make better machines or any other thing that was down to them and their tech, but downfall of another company! "arrogant & ignorant"
assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
yo_john117 said:
umm yeah they tested 1040 xbox to see what the fail rate was and 16% of them failed...so yeah looks like i was right. Dude get over yourself, RROD is not very widespread any more. Saying that its above 25% is about as stupid as saying the PS3 has no games...so if you believe that the 360 has a fail rate of above 25% you must still believe that the PS3 has no games. BOTH of those stupid fanboy beliefs need to die RIGHT THE FUCK NOW!!!
|
But isn't 5-12% still a ridiculously high failure rate for a console that's been out for 3 yrs now? I mean thats still about 1 in 10 consoles. Microsoft really should have had this problem sorted by now and had the failure rate dropped to within industry standards.
How on earth did this end up as yet another RROD thread? It started with such promise. All 360 threads end in RROD, just like all PS3 threads end in 360 has more AAA games.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
binary solo
The title "Who here is happy that Xbox is ahead of Playstation this generation?" Will have to included RRoD, its a factor in a lot of peoples thinking.
assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
binary solo said: How on earth did this end up as yet another RROD thread? It started with such promise. All 360 threads end in RROD, just like all PS3 threads end in 360 has more AAA games. |
After 200+ posts is it surprising that the thread goes off topic and eventually returns to the same old arguments?