LCDs.
Got both. 40" lcd and 58" plasma.
both are samsung, plasma really shows the difference between game quality.
| TheRealMafoo said: LCD cost less to ship, last longer, and works at more altitude. You also never have to worry about screen burn in (although new Plasmas are very good at this too). if you want the best TV image, I still say get a DLP TV. I was lucky enough to get an LCOS before they stopped making them (cost to much to make, but have the purest picture posable). |
I still have one of the last best Sony Wega Fine Pitch CRT's. They still have the best contrast available and i still think lcd and plasma are catching up slowly. DLP's, i haven't seen many of, but unless you mean rear projection, but they are huge boxes.
Id buy plasma but pay alot of money so its a decent high resolution, quality build with pixel death rate count and yea check for screen burn.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
^ CRTs are still fairly good actually. It's just that they were big and companies needed something new to sell.
A good quality CRT owns either LCD or Plasma. But perhaps not for long.
Sony Plasma 50" Bravia in 1080p. You get what you pay for. Pay more get better quality. Cheap brand HD TVs are cheap and nasty.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
