"The reviewer is a 13 year old american. "

Link?

And haven't I made it perfectly clear why they rated it so low?

Yes you have.

Didint you see the pic of the kid who reviewd Lair?

The Genji 2 joke is a classic and hillarious.

Glad a lot of you are liking it so far, I definitely did and even though it was short I thought it was worth the price of admissions for how good it was.

As for the IGN review. IGN gave it the lowest review out of all the big review sites or magazines. Game Informer and EGM both had one 9/10 review each of this game, despite its length.

I think that should lay people's doubts to rest.

I'd like to see the game get a higher difficulty too and obviously the length. Those are my only two complaints pretty much. I don't think it necessarily needs a jump button.

Ckmlb,

I don't think this is an AAA game, it's more like an 8.7 game. Ninja Gaiden, for example, is a better all-around game; so is Devil May Cry.

The only thing fanboyish here leo-j is to think IGN is biased when they didn't give your favorite game a score you wanted.

 he just done not know how argue his opinion.

 Heres why ign HS review is idiotic.

They gave Genji a 6, Hs a 7 that = morons.

I'm talking about Kingdom Hearts 2.

There are many valid reasons why they gave the game a 7.6.

From the looks of it, Hus, you don't seem to know how to back up your opinion neither.

They said KH2 had low replay value because its a "hack and slash", also they wanted a more challenging game, they should have played it in proud mode.

KH2 has immense replay value, and they gave gameplay a 7.5 which I think is unbelieveble since its an improvement from the first KH.

Out of every single reviewer IGN gave it the lowest score.