By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - X360 outselling PS3 despite having fewer exclusive games

nightsurge on 17 April 2009
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge
U don't get it..sony had to pay the price for doing the stuff last gen with ps2 that eventually led them to huge success...but now according to Sony hardware PR 3rd party exclusivity has been declared as non functional..they are no longer interested in luring 3rd party exclusivities which doesn't mean that MS has rights to continue owing to ps2. They are assisting every single 3rd party devs to keep the lead. And u can't deny it..

This line explains just how retarded Sony is.  They won the last 2 generations by immense third party support, and now that they are far behind, they claim to not need it and have shifted to first party.

Microsoft is assisting third parties just the same as Sony.  The only other times MS has anything to do with it is with DLC.

And what are you even trying to say in that red section?  Seriously for a "game analyser", which analyzer is spelled wrong by the way, you don't know your stuff.

 



Around the Network
GameAnalyser on 17 April 2009

@nightsurge

and even if MS continues any support from 3rd party as u declare so they are not going to be benifitted much as they can't continue developing on a single transistory console



nightsurge on 17 April 2009
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge

and even if MS continues any support from 3rd party as u declare so they are not going to be benifitted much as they can't continue developing on a single transistory console

You seriously are clueless aren't you.  And I seriously can't understand 80% of what you type.  Learn english, form correct sentences, then try to express your ideas.

What exactly are you trying to say in the bold?



Seraphic_Sixaxis on 17 April 2009

Wow just wow....

You never learn do you.



GameAnalyser on 17 April 2009
nightsurge said:
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge
U don't get it..sony had to pay the price for doing the stuff last gen with ps2 that eventually led them to huge success...but now according to Sony hardware PR 3rd party exclusivity has been declared as non functional..they are no longer interested in luring 3rd party exclusivities which doesn't mean that MS has rights to continue owing to ps2. They are assisting every single 3rd party devs to keep the lead. And u can't deny it..

This line explains just how retarded Sony is.  They won the last 2 generations by immense third party support, and now that they are far behind, they claim to not need it and have shifted to first party.

Microsoft is assisting third parties just the same as Sony.  The only other times MS has anything to do with it is with DLC.

And what are you even trying to say in that red section?  Seriously for a "game analyser", which analyzer is spelled wrong by the way, you don't know your stuff.

 

 

 

Well i mite be not so  grammatically sharp as u..but i can still correct myself with such suggestions.

On topic.. Sony wants to prove that this gen even w/o third party they will be able to stay in the market, just not being retarded but playing fair. If u can convince me by end of 2009 that sales of 360 would surge to a gap of more than 20 million, then they are looting all from (retarded)Sony this gen the way ps2 did over GC and xbox. By saying the rate @ which console's h/w sales hover around ps3 range I don't consider any luck. Maybe a slim 360 mite stand chance..who knows..we will c.



Around the Network
DingoEgret on 17 April 2009

yes the ps3 has better exclusives

again the problem is the price cut,if the ps3 get one things may begin to change...



Use power for the right things. At least for the things that you believe in.

GameAnalyser on 17 April 2009
nightsurge said:
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge

and even if MS continues any support from 3rd party as u declare so they are not going to be benifitted much as they can't continue developing on a single transistory console

You seriously are clueless aren't you.  And I seriously can't understand 80% of what you type.  Learn english, form correct sentences, then try to express your ideas.

What exactly are you trying to say in the bold?

 

 And now u impose me 2 deviate from topic commenting on my English Grammar and sentence formations. If u can't understand English then it's not my fault. I've expressed my view-points precisely. If u wan't me to use more difficult vocabs and idioms then i can trouble u for more than 90% trying to understand what I am posting here.



Dark Chaos on 17 April 2009
GameAnalyser said:
nightsurge said:
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge
U don't get it..sony had to pay the price for doing the stuff last gen with ps2 that eventually led them to huge success...but now according to Sony hardware PR 3rd party exclusivity has been declared as non functional..they are no longer interested in luring 3rd party exclusivities which doesn't mean that MS has rights to continue owing to ps2. They are assisting every single 3rd party devs to keep the lead. And u can't deny it..

This line explains just how retarded Sony is.  They won the last 2 generations by immense third party support, and now that they are far behind, they claim to not need it and have shifted to first party.

Microsoft is assisting third parties just the same as Sony.  The only other times MS has anything to do with it is with DLC.

And what are you even trying to say in that red section?  Seriously for a "game analyser", which analyzer is spelled wrong by the way, you don't know your stuff.

 

 

 

Well i mite be not so  grammatically sharp as u..but i can still correct myself with such suggestions.

On topic.. Sony wants to prove that this gen even w/o third party they will be able to stay in the market, just not being retarded but playing fair. If u can convince me by end of 2009 that sales of 360 would surge to a gap of more than 20 million, then they are looting all from (retarded)Sony this gen the way ps2 did over GC and xbox. By saying the rate @ which console's h/w sales hover around ps3 range I don't consider any luck. Maybe a slim 360 mite stand chance..who knows..we will c.

What do u mean by that?

 



GameAnalyser on 17 April 2009

@nightsurge
In the bold statement i was trying to explain that third party developers simply can’t sustain the costs if they solely support one platform



nightsurge on 17 April 2009
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge
In the bold statement i was trying to explain that third party developers simply can’t sustain the costs if they solely support one platform

That makes sense.  The way you wrote it, "they" referred to MS so I was confused as to why MS couldn't continue developing for one console....

Oh and third parties could easily develop for one console and make up all costs involved.  Especially if the game is well made and for the 360.