By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Tea Parties: Whats really going on?

Kasz216 said:
The Ghost of RubangB said:
@Kasz, Glenn Beck still does radio stuff across the country, but now he has a show on Fox, and he was one of the 4 Fox News personalities that hosted tea parties. He hosted his at the Alamo and claimed it was "the only place that really really makes sense."

Oh.  In that case in his parnoid mind i'm sure it was because he thought it was a good place for a "Futile last stand before the deficit spending doomed us all... ending in us being nuked by Iran."

Hahaha, I bet.  Well you understand him better than I ever could.  I hope you can't understand him TOO MUCH though.  His way of thinking might be contagious.



Around the Network

Goodness man, you're trying to label it as though I'm claiming THE ONLY THING that's perpetuating racism is AA. Tell me where I said that? Please point it out. Why are you trying to dig a trench around my statement? Because you're filling it with water and drowning in it.

I said simply that AA perpetuates racism via resentment. Nothing more. It's not exclusive, it's not the sole vessel of perpetuation, it's not a monopoly on racist momentum nor did I ever once suggest it as such.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

theprof00 said:
Kasz216 said:
theprof00 said:
Viper1 said:
theprof00 said:
BTW sqrl,
I think you would be interested in the result of implicit attitude tests.

meta-studies of hundreds of different studies like these show that a very large amount of the population in USA have at least some unconscious racist bias against black people.

I'll look for the actual statistics... but these tests along with others are the whole basis of Equal Oportunity Employment and Affirmative Action.

Affirmative Action is not about equality, it's about providing an unfair advantage to a specific population group.    It perpetuates that unconcious racist bias that you even pointed out.

The more we treat a specific group as "special" the longer it will take for racism to dissipate.

Wow. you are clueless. Racism exists in other countries that don't have AA either like other 1st world countries. You really have no basis for your words and not only that, you will never even slightly teensy eensy weensilly concede that you may be judging based on your own views...

 

... not really.

Think about this.  Say your a poor person living in the city.  You have a really crappy life.  Say a poor person of a different color lives in the same city.  They live the same crappy life.

Say your told that they will get advantages you won't... because there is some rich guy off somewhere who has the same skin color as you.

This doesn't give you resentment?

Taking care of the poor should be done from the bottom up... based soley on need.

 

Being poor has nothing to do with it. Having a crappy life has nothing to do with it.

No it doesn't give me resentment because 90% of the time (and trust me that is a pretty accurate statistic) I will get a job easier than the black man will.

 

Hooray.  You'll get a job at Wal-mart easier while the black person will get to go to college and get a real job.  I'm sure that will be a big comfort.



Kasz216 said:
akuma587 said:

Reagan was right to cut taxes because 1) the country was facing staglation, and 2) the tax rates were pretty high.  I am just upset that so many people now think that cutting taxes is the solution to every economic problem.

He was also smart for later passing that tax hike, as the economy had recovered and it would hurt revenue otherwise.  I won't comment on any of the political decisionmaking that went into the decisions, but they were sound economic ones for that time.

But our economic situation wasn't quite so bad during Reagan's second term.  I don't think Reagan's decision to spend money on the Cold War was a foolish one in the same way that Bush's decision to invade Iraq was, I just think it set a bad precedent of excessive military spending.  Reagan's decision was at least a rational one.  But I do question people's belief that the Soviet Union would not have collapsed without that spending.

In terms of modern day, I mean I didn't care as much about Afghanistan (although I certainly wasn't promoting us invading the country) as they were actively housing terrorists involved in 9/11.  That was at least a rational decision in comparison.  Lol, and I don't know if I would call it 9/11 love, more like 9/11 fear.  People were acting so fucking crazy after 9/11 here in the Texas.  They thought terrorists would attack our podunk ass 200,000 person town.  Simply ridiculous.

And if we were concerned about rooting out terrorists in the Middle East who were tied to 9/11, we should have looked at Saudi Arabia too.  But we had too many other kinds of political ties with them for that to be an option (at least in Bush's eyes).

 

But the tax hike was passed during the recession.

In 1982... when the recession was at it's worst.  Furthmore Congress cut government spending.

It's been called the biggest tax hike in US history.

Yeah, but compared to the massiveness of his earlier tax cuts they were not substantial, but you are correct.  I bet most conservatives would say you were lying if you told them that Reagan raised taxes four separate times during his tenure in office.  But it actually shows to me that he wasn't a complete idiot that some liberals make him out to be (well, if you just ignore all that Moral Majority BS).  A true fiscal conservative is not afraid to raise taxes.  I don't understand why so few people understand that these days:

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0301.green.html

Reagan, who never came to terms with this episode of ideological apostasy, persuaded himself that the three-year, $100 billion tax hike--the largest since World War II--was actually "tax reform" that closed loopholes in his earlier cut and therefore didn't count as raising taxes.)

Faced with looming deficits, Reagan raised taxes again in 1983 with a gasoline tax and once more in 1984, this time by $50 billion over three years, mainly through closing tax loopholes for business. Despite the fact that such increases were anathema to conservatives--and probably cost Reagan's successor, George H.W. Bush, reelection--Reagan raised taxes a grand total of four times just between 1982-84.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Let me break it down for you.

AA tells a company that if you have two candidates for employment who both meet the required credentials, you have to pick the minority candidate IF and ONLY IF your minority quota has not been fulfilled.
The whole reason it was enforced was because Equal Opportunity did not then exist in the workforce and still doesn't (It may not be as bad as it was, but the hiring biases are still there).

It's a common misconception that less qualified minorities are taking jobs from the "whites who deserve them", but if that scenario actually did happen, those white people would be able to file for a discrimination suit (but they don't, because they know the qualifications were met).



Around the Network

I think Glenn Beck has schizophrenia or a cocaine addiction.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

theprof00 said:
Let me break it down for you.

AA tells a company that if you have two candidates for employment who both meet the required credentials, you have to pick the minority candidate IF and ONLY IF your minority quota has not been fulfilled.
The whole reason it was enforced was because Equal Opportunity did not then exist in the workforce and still doesn't (It may not be as bad as it was, but the hiring biases are still there).

It's a common misconception that less qualified minorities are taking jobs from the "whites who deserve them", but if that scenario actually did happen, those white people would be able to file for a discrimination suit (but they don't, because they know the qualifications were met).

Can't two people meet the same qualfications for something... and one person be more qualified?

I think you seem to be missing that.

 



Kasz216 said:
theprof00 said:

Being poor has nothing to do with it. Having a crappy life has nothing to do with it.

No it doesn't give me resentment because 90% of the time (and trust me that is a pretty accurate statistic) I will get a job easier than the black man will.

 

Hooray.  You'll get a job at Wal-mart easier while the black person will get to go to college and get a real job.  I'm sure that will be a big comfort.

 

No kasz, that 90% applies to school application as well as everything else.

  Black men earned about 78 cents on the dollar for every dollar white men earn. Black women earn about people earn 68 cents for every dollar white people earn (these figures are lower depending on where you look).

(source is not exactly a peer-reviewed journal, but I can assure you this is the reality)

 



theprof00 said:
Let me break it down for you.

AA tells a company that if you have two candidates for employment who both meet the required credentials, you have to pick the minority candidate IF and ONLY IF your minority quota has not been fulfilled.
The whole reason it was enforced was because Equal Opportunity did not then exist in the workforce and still doesn't (It may not be as bad as it was, but the hiring biases are still there).

It's a common misconception that less qualified minorities are taking jobs from the "whites who deserve them", but if that scenario actually did happen, those white people would be able to file for a discrimination suit (but they don't, because they know the qualifications were met).

I'm well aware of what AA is.  My entire poitn is grounded on the basis of what you just said and if you don't think this kind of special treatment generates resentment, you really need to research it.

 



The rEVOLution is not being televised

This is my stance on affirmative action:

Oh, and Rush Limbaugh thinks that Obama got where he is because of affirmative action.  Just ignore the douchy guy before and after the Rush Limbaugh clip:



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson