By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Sony: Make MOAR sell LESS

mjc2021 said:
Megadude said:
The marketing alone on Halo 3 was the same cost as making 2 Uncharted's. Gamers don't play sales, or hype so the only thing you're showing off here is how superior PS3's linup is.

For 360 2009 ain't looking so good:

Is Halo Wars outselling Killzone 2? NOPE

Did Street figher 4 sell better on 360? NOPE

Did Resident Evil 5 sell better on 360? NOPE

Don't worry 360 fanboys you will always cherish those memories and feelings of 2006-2007 right?


Killzone 2 will be outsold many times over by ODST.

SF4, RE5 and even DMC4 are some of few that sold better and have a Japanese following. They also only have a lead of maybe 200K? Call of Duty games and GTA4 on the other hand have a lead by millions. That's more impressive.

Guitar Hero Metellica out sold the PS3 version.

Other less known games have sold better on the 360 such as Wheelman, Wanted, MLB2K9, Skate 2, Legends of Wrestlemania, H.A.W.X, Genesis Collection, Fear 2, Afro Samurai, etc.

 

And you don't think those games have american following???

 



Around the Network

GT5 is going against a new Halo not Halo 3. Halo OSD. Halo Wars is canceling all KZ2 sales. What is next?



Jordahn said:
mjc2021 said:
Jordahn said:
Like someone else similar comment that the mjc refuses to use the same standard for 360 vs. Wii. Go figure. I do believe that the phrase "strength in numbers" hold true for a lot of situatons. Too bad mjc perverted that perception in this thread. As I implied, I'm a platformer and survival/horror fan. Are the sales of games such as Ratchet & Clank Future: TOD, Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty, Siren, and Little Big Planet are going to deter me from enjoying those games? Why should it if I'm a gamer? So like several have pointed out that as a gamer, we play games, not sales. So having the variety and quality I seek is a correct use of "strength in numbers."

If I just cared about number I would own a Wii, right? I just felt like point that out for the sake of conversation.

 

It's obvious that you care more about the 360 than being a gamer.

 

 

You PWNED that guy.



CGI-Quality said:
monlosez said:

GT5 is going against a new Halo not Halo 3. Halo OSD. Halo Wars is canceling all KZ2 sales. What is next?

Your statement now makes a tad more sense. Halo Wars isn't cancelling anything. And to be honest, GT5 isn't going against Halo (anything) either. Two different demographics COMPLETELY.

 

 

Two biggest IPs for Sony and MS. In a sense they are, platinum sellers.



CGI-Quality said:
monlosez said:
CGI-Quality said:
monlosez said:

GT5 is going against a new Halo not Halo 3. Halo OSD. Halo Wars is canceling all KZ2 sales. What is next?

Your statement now makes a tad more sense. Halo Wars isn't cancelling anything. And to be honest, GT5 isn't going against Halo (anything) either. Two different demographics COMPLETELY.

 

 

Two biggest IPs for Sony and MS. In a sense they are, platinum sellers.

Regardless, they just can't be compared. A game like GT5 will not only sell to an entirely different crowd, but at a different pace as well.

 

 

OK lol, we can compare Halo3 and KZ2 then GT5 and Forza3, rofl.



Around the Network

I think topic creator did make this thread to make fun of PS3 and their fans but it is still sales based.

4 of the most popular xbox 360 titles versus 10 of the most popular PS3 titles (MSG 4 is oddly missing though). It is a interesting thing to point out, I didn't realize these sales figures at all, didn't think about it.

These topics are the biggest topics I realized too (many have many pages like this one), when I think of forums I think of this: arguing, stating "facts", talking about beliefs in "quality", mine is better than yours talk, trash talking, etc. Keep up the debating.

All in all though, sales are sales, they're facts. 4 xbox games beat 10 PS3 games (selected ones but still main titles), no way to change that.



CGI-Quality said:
mjc2021 said:
Jboy0990 said:
Wow why does it even matter
I mean people grow up they are consoles
of course the cheaper ones are gonna sell before the more expensive ones i mean come on

The PS3 didn't fail because it's more expensive. It failed because its too damn expensive. And before you fanboys get angry I mean it failed in comparison to previous success Playstation consoles had.

The PS1 and PS2 launched for $300. Price drops soon followed making it $200 and lower.  A fair price people are willing to pay for a gaming machine.

The PS3 on the other hand launched for $600 and 2+ years later it's still more expensive than the launch price of previous consoles. If Sony can't be a success at this price than nobody can.

Despite this, Jboy wins this argument, DOES it REALLY matter? Enjoy your consoles, let MS, Nintendo and Sony duke it out in the market. Guess why, their fierce competition = better games for all of us!!!

 

Had he ended on, "I mean people grow up they are consoles." I wouldn't have said any thing.

However this comment, "of course the cheaper ones are gonna sell before the more expensive ones i mean come on." That was the fanboy in him speaking. My comment was in regards to that. So no... Jboy does not win.



What? Its the truth
I'm tellin u its cuz the ps3 is more expensive thats the only reason grow up
Do you think you are better than me cuz your a damn MS fan?
Seriously who cares this thread is for nothing but to piss of ps3 fans and you should be banned for it cuz all ur doin is startin shit with ppl honestly



Jboy0990 said:
What? Its the truth
I'm tellin u its cuz the ps3 is more expensive thats the only reason grow up
Do you think you are better than me cuz your a damn MS fan?
Seriously who cares this thread is for nothing but to piss of ps3 fans and you should be banned for it cuz all ur doin is startin shit with ppl honestly

Yes, MS fans have a gene that makes them vastly superior. Read the February edition of Time Life.

Actually what I'm really saying is if the PS3 launched for $300 (as opposed to $600!!!) it would be the top selling console. Obviously the console wouldn't be as powerful or bluray at that price but Sony never won a console war being the most powerful console in the market. I'm not saying that as a fan of any console, company, etc. I owned a PS1 and PS2, if Sony didn't drop the ball on pricing I'd might be a PS3 owner as well.



But you making this post doesn't prove anything
Of course 360s games are selling more because more 360s have sold than ps3s
i mean just think about it if somebody bought two games for every 360 they bought and same with ps3 then of course the games will sell more
360 is ahead of ps3
I honestly think that if ps3 and 360s sales were the same then the games sales would be the same too