By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Graphics: Resident Evil 5 360 > Killzone 2?

yo_john117 said:
Feylic said:
yo_john117 said:
Feylic said:
yo_john117 said:
Feylic said:
yo_john117 said:
Megadude said:

First off the omg it looks better on 360 is BS. RE5 is a beautiful game on both systems and you will only notice if you hook up some fuggin machine that counts fps and licks Bill Gates butt at the same time. I have seen both versions and they look the SAME baby. "OH MY GOD YOU CAN SEE TWO EXTRA pixels on Chris Redfields nut bulge OMG!!!!" No you cant you don't notice that trash at all.

DEAR GOD LOOK HOW MUCH BETTER IT LOOKS ON 360! More then makes up for not being able to play bluray with extra quality like that that's why the 360 version is selling better!

With that said Killzone 2 will SPOIL you and make even the most amazing games (like RE5) look dated. It's not a diss to RE5, just a complement to Killpwn 2. It's not hype, the visuals on the game are STUNNING.

I really wish X-Bots would stop. NOTHING on 360 looks as good as Killzone 2...YET. Let's wait for E3 and hope MS will drop a new IP that will outperform KZ2. Untill then ;)

Damn!!! I don't think anyone said that RE5 is better on one system than the other. Soooo where did this lil trollish post pop up from??

You know what assuming makes out of you and me ;)

 

uhm.... read the OP again. Assuming just makes things out of you...

 

Show me exactly where it says in the original post that RE5 is better on the 360 than the PS3.

Cause he said nothing of the sort. Learn to read thoroughly my friend.

 

You first

 

 

 

Instead of saying a stupid statement like that, how bout you back up your first comment directed towards me with proof. So show me exactly where the OP said that RE5 is better on the 360 then. Because i read it and he said nothing about one being better than the other.

 

Well seeing how you've already gotten enough things wrong in this thread, I'll explain. What would be the point of making a thread like this if you thought RE5 on both platforms was exactly the same? Why would RE5 on the 360 looking better than KZ2 be a big deal if RE5 on the PS3 looked better than KZ2 as well? If RE5 on both platforms looked better than KZ2, why would you compare the 360 version, to KZ2, why not compare both versions of RE5. It seems to me that the post insinuates that the 360 version is better, only then does it make sense.

 

 

Instead of assuming thats what he meant how bout you ask him if thats part of what he meant....

Get off your high horse dude at least i admit when i am wrong but you keep fighting like a little 2 year old when proven wrong, but i'm done its not worth it to argue with someone like you.

 

Sorry, I forget sometimes that it's difficult for some people to think.



Around the Network
richardhutnik said:
Does Re5 have dust storm and other particle effects that KZ2 has? The textures and graphics of the play environment are NOT why KZ2 stands out. It stands out because of the weather effects, wind, lightning and so on. This is why it stands out, because Helghan is a dusty and boring place to visit, unless there is shooting going on.

 

this is the answer... the weather and the environment(the explosion, the destruction, the shooting, etc.) that made

KZ2 overpass RE5... no doubt!



PLAYSTATION®2 is the yesterday.....NOW.......still......A_L_I_V_E

Consoles own:

Nintendo: Famicom(japanese NES, Family Computer), GBC, GBA, DS, Wii

Sony: PS1, PS2, PSP, PS3

Microsoft: future 360 owner

MyBrute

kowenicki said:
@ mikeb

Your contstant undermining of vgchartz figures is tiresome at best and insulting at worst....

I respect VGChartz for what it is and actually the managers don't claim to be absolutely accurate at all. I think VGChartz provides a great and quite unique community service!

However local fully professional tracking services also have error margins to deal with. VGChartz tries to track sales globally instead of just highly specialized tracking locally, this is of course a mammoth task. Naturally when dealing with so many different regions and countries, including areas for which there is a severe lack of available 3rd party tracking data error margins will be bigger, especially so in course of time. (I have studied statistics as part of my education)

That's why I first and foremost use sold to retail data for direct sales comparisons, as this data is complete, absolute and has to be legally accurate for Microsoft as well as Sony (so I take its value above any tracking data, not just VGChartz!). I however do believe there are more still unsold 360s on the shelves than PS3s, this due to the well protected standard PS3 boxes taking up more shelf space.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

One_touch_KO said:
I did not found RE5 that impressive apart of the light efects... I don't consider it superior to uncharted or KZ2...

 

 



KZ2 does some things better than RE5 but overall RE5 has much better polish than KZ2. It's kinda like MGS4 compared to KZ2. KZ2 will have areas that look amazing and better but overall and polished completely, MGS4 looks a hell of a lot better than KZ2. RE5 is the same way. It as an entire game looks better than KZ2 even not having the same graphical proweress. KZ2 needed more touch ups and polish and it didn't get it. RE5 and MGS4 are made by some of the best developers in the world and got that polish and this is why they look quite amazing.

Not saying KZ2 doesn't look great but it still needed work imo.



Around the Network
Feylic said:
yo_john117 said:
Feylic said:
yo_john117 said:
Feylic said:
yo_john117 said:
Megadude said:

First off the omg it looks better on 360 is BS. RE5 is a beautiful game on both systems and you will only notice if you hook up some fuggin machine that counts fps and licks Bill Gates butt at the same time. I have seen both versions and they look the SAME baby. "OH MY GOD YOU CAN SEE TWO EXTRA pixels on Chris Redfields nut bulge OMG!!!!" No you cant you don't notice that trash at all.

DEAR GOD LOOK HOW MUCH BETTER IT LOOKS ON 360! More then makes up for not being able to play bluray with extra quality like that that's why the 360 version is selling better!

With that said Killzone 2 will SPOIL you and make even the most amazing games (like RE5) look dated. It's not a diss to RE5, just a complement to Killpwn 2. It's not hype, the visuals on the game are STUNNING.

I really wish X-Bots would stop. NOTHING on 360 looks as good as Killzone 2...YET. Let's wait for E3 and hope MS will drop a new IP that will outperform KZ2. Untill then ;)

Damn!!! I don't think anyone said that RE5 is better on one system than the other. Soooo where did this lil trollish post pop up from??

You know what assuming makes out of you and me ;)

 

uhm.... read the OP again. Assuming just makes things out of you...

 

Show me exactly where it says in the original post that RE5 is better on the 360 than the PS3.

Cause he said nothing of the sort.  Learn to read thoroughly my friend.

 

You first

 

 

 

Instead of saying a stupid statement like that, how bout you back up your first comment directed towards me with proof.  So show me exactly where the OP said that RE5 is better on the 360 then. Because i read it and he said nothing about one being better than the other.

 

Well seeing how you've already gotten enough things wrong in this thread, I'll explain. What would be the point of making a thread like this if you thought RE5 on both platforms was exactly the same? Why would RE5 on the 360 looking better than KZ2 be a big deal if RE5 on the PS3 looked better than KZ2 as well? If RE5 on both platforms looked better than KZ2, why would you compare the 360 version, to KZ2, why not compare both versions of RE5. It seems to me that the post insinuates that the 360 version is better, only then does it make sense.

 

Stop trying to convince yourself that you didn't make a mistake believing the OP said RE5 on 360 is better than RE5 on PS3, Freylic.  The OP was talking about the 360 RE5 because that's the one he personally has experience with.

My bad.  Jeronimo66 actually does think RE5 looks better on 360.  I can't back you up on that one, Jeronimo66.



Tag: Hawk - Reluctant Dark Messiah (provided by fkusumot)

i think RE5 looks better ... you can know why if you go to chapter 2 of KZ2 and notice the tyres in the ally.. if i have time later i will post a photo for it.



MikeB said:
kowenicki said:
MikeB said:
Mendicate Bias said:
MikeB said:
Mendicate Bias said:
Oh hi Mike, how is you 140 million LTD for PS3 sales going?

Still on track with my anticipations of doing ~10 million sales per year, hopefully a cheaper slimline product gets released this year so it can do my anticipated ~15 million on average sales per year. Let's wait for 2016 before coming to conclusions, ok?

BTW, I said I expected going beyond 100 million should be no problem assuming Sony's 10 year lifecycle. If somebody would have said in the first half of 1997 the Playstation 1 would sell over 100 million, maybe people would have frowned as well (was only about 14 million shipped taking equal timeframes). So let's not get pre-emptively childish and off topic, ok?

 

 

So even though its currently tracking well below what it was last year you still won't concede.

 

The funny thing is, despite no cut on entry pricing for over 1 and a half years it isn't.

wrong again mike.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=67490

And yes I'm referring to vgchartz numbers... not "im mikeb - tracking god" figures.

LOL, and what do you think VGChartz' error margin for "Other" regions is?

Even those figures don't show "well below", but "just below" instead.

Even taking the VGChartz data you used, the gap between PS3 data last year this month vs the PS3 data this year this month is less than 10% apart. Well less than error margins here.

If VGchartz says a game sold 50 thousand while in fact another source says 55 thousands, people usually applaud this as being very accurate. IMO at least such people should not use double standards, either the estimation error was small and the PS3 based on even VGChartz data is very similar. Or 10% error margin is huge, in which case VGChartz cannot be used as a reliable source. We know VGChartz has been off quite a bit from time in the past, let's be realistic.

Understand?

 

Yeah, I think I get the gist.  So, since the error margin is 10%, and the gap between PS3 data last year this month vs the PS3 data this year this month is about 9%, that actually means PS3 might be doing up to 19% lower sales this year.

Got it.



Tag: Hawk - Reluctant Dark Messiah (provided by fkusumot)

@ Hawk

The margin of error should be way higher than that, this of course regarding all the platforms (from a scientific perspective). One platform overtracked and another undertracked (or vice versa), so you cannot derive solid conclusions from just this data.

For this its IMO best to wait for the latest sold to retail figures and compare those instead.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

This picture is needed in these kinds of threads...



Former something....