I want to make a new label up for my view, 'Anti-Harm'.

I wouldn't have an abortion if I was a woman, unless I was raped, the condom broke, or my birth control didn't work for me. If I got a girl pregnant I wouldn't pressure her either way. It's not my choice to stop women if it's early enough in pregnancy, since it does no harm, and actually helps society by not bringing about another cunsumer into the overpopulated human world. Think of the starving africans.

Past a certain point in pregnancy it should be illegal though, since it does harm.

Anti-harm ftw.

Know what's funny? Guys don't get a choice in abortion, at the same time they don't get to choose whether to help raise the kid or not afterwards. I think we should be thrown a bone here, it's feminism at its finest.

I agree, we need a way to transplant the child to an artificial male womb, if the women wants an abortion and the man doesn't. I also think men shouldn't have to be forced to pay child support if the women had a chance to get an abortion.

Exactly.

So until the kid is 18 years old? (earlier in some cases, later in others)

That's either a funny joke or you completely mis-interpreted what was meant.

Either way you ruined it by asking the question.

The only 'right' that actually exists is when it does not require or interfere with the right of another human being, hence the pro-choice crowd argues for the elimination of the rights of the child in favor for the parent. Anyone ever noticed how quick people are willing to defend the ability to murder children, yet get defensive if you try to defend those who cannot defend themselves? Maybe some folks here should actually begin to socialize and venture out into the real world because the disconnect they have with reality and their own moral compass is very disturbing.

What does make me smile though are the majority of people who argue pro choice policies are unlikely to reproduce themselves. Which if you're going to advocate the destruction of your own species then by all means don't continue your damaged gene pool.

Ok let's all be hoenst. Did anyone else laugh at how pathetic this post was when they read through it?

Pro Tip: It's not a child until it reaches a few years of age. It's not a baby until it's born. It's a fetus.

But fetuses don't know what the human concept of being human is. I'm defending womens right to not go through 9 months of bullshit to bring a needy little being into the world. Abortion, before a certain point, is not equal to murder, in my opinon, because it doesn't know the human concept of death

We should begin to socialize? Most people I know are pro choice. You think it's disturbing that we want to give a fully grown and sentient human more right that a fetus? I think it's disturbing you want to force millions of women through painful pregnancy and birth, and force millions of consumers upon our already overpopulated world.

As for the moral compass thing, disconnect with reality comment, everyone has their own moral compass, it doesn't mean they're disconnected with reality, they just have different opinions.

As for the bolded, I do advocate the reduction of our species(through peaceful means), but not destruction. There's way too many of us. Us humans are smart enough to know right and wrong, and we shouldn't act the same as other animals by polluting the planet with as many of ourselves as possible.