7 pages???? WTF!!!!

Where's the argument here??? SONY has the biggest 1st party.... DONE and DONE!

From where did u pull this out off??? Using Metacritic, Gamerankings SONY titles outperform Nintendo titles easily. ALso they are innovative, bring something new and don't try to bring ports and the 10 iteration of a series.

^ these posts are why there is still arguing.

Saying they have a good first-party dev is not a problem but saying they equal to Microsoft and Nintendo combined is. If those are not fighting words, then I don't know what is. It is an obvious slap to the face to MS and Nintendo once they mentioned them, why did they mention them? To say they are better then them, why else would they mention them.

People just find it annoying, most would think: "you are last, stfu". They should just stop all these bad PR statements, I don't want to dislike them.

Also I don't find PS3 innovative at all, the reason why there is a lot of 360/PS3 references is because they are pretty similar in their offerings. Nintendo wins the Innovative title but that doesn't mean their innovation is good either to you just to the other 50+ million people.

Where is the quantity of games that prove it. With all those employees, they are still releasing less games.......

When did I ever say quantity = quality?

They have so many people, but compared to Nintendo's AMOUNT of 1st-party releases, their dev size seems meaningless.

All those people with not as much (game releases) to show for it.

If we're only looking at home consoles... SONY releases more games each year than Nintendo.... I posted this with a list of games b4.... it was too much work b4 for me to do it again.......

This thread just won't die....

I think the only way they can bash Sony is talking about sales

Clearly, 3rd party studios should abandon the PS3. Sony's first party studios are suffocating any chance they have for success on that platform.