theprof00 said:
How about games that are not on the 360....... Oh, what do you know....................ps3 wins.
|
Is there an echo in here?
theprof00 said:
How about games that are not on the 360....... Oh, what do you know....................ps3 wins.
|
Is there an echo in here?
Xbox 360 has more AAA games because it was on the market a year longer hence a longer time period during which game-devs focused all their resources in one console. The 360 didn't have any competition at that time. If both had been released at the same time then the current situation, in terms of sales and games., wouldn't be so goodfor the 360.
Initiating social expirement #928719281
| 786_ali said: Xbox 360 has more AAA games because it was on the market a year longer hence a longer time period during which game-devs focused all their resources in one console. The 360 didn't have any competition at that time. If both had been released at the same time then the current situation, in terms of sales and games., wouldn't be so goodfor the 360. |
OK.............. PS3........ 2 years on the market (over 2 years in japan and usa)........ 11 AAA games.
360.......... 3 years 4 months on the market........ 21 AAA games.......
You do the math.
Ronster316 said:
OK.............. PS3........ 2 years on the market (over 2 years in japan and usa)........ 11 AAA games. 360.......... 3 years 4 months on the market........ 21 AAA games.......
You do the math. |
Yes, it was on the market for one year longer but during that year many games were released for the 360 which would otherwise be released for the ps3.
Initiating social expirement #928719281
786_ali said:
Yes, it was on the market for one year longer but during that year many games were released for the 360 which would otherwise be released for the ps3. |
Like what?
Name one 360 game with AAA status that would have been on the ps3............. (Gears? Halo? Forza? Braid? Gears 2? GTA L&D?)
You have bioshock
And you have orange box (problem is orange box on ps3 SUCKS)
mjc2021 said:
Nintendo is a power house publisher. Microsoft has published very successful games. Sony is somewhere below that. |
You're talking about being a "powerhouse publisher" right?
Smack yourself

Ronster316 said:
Like what? Name one 360 game with AAA status that would have been on the ps3............. (Gears? Halo? Forza? Braid? Gears 2? GTA L&D?) You have bioshock And you have orange box (problem is orange box on ps3 SUCKS) |
He's talking about the period between 2005 and 2006, in which Dead Rising, COD2, Saint's Row, etc. came out

| halil23 said: To the blind fanboy that lost the Killzone 2 bet for obvious reasons, read my 1st post, if you don't believe that then you'll never be cured from your blind fanboy you currently have! |
I read your "this games review site doesn't like the game i do waa waa waa" post.
picking and choosing which review sites are trustworthy or not proves what exactly?
Theres biased reviews all over the net for both 360 and ps3 games.
Left 4 Dead scored 70 in one review.......... you know what...... i got over it.
WOW 17%. I need to get me one of those.
Because I totally value the high scores reviewers give games that I don't ever care to play. Awesome!


BMaker11 said:
He's talking about the period between 2005 and 2006, in which Dead Rising, COD2, Saint's Row, etc. came out
|
I can appreciate that COD 2, Dead rising and saints were released on 360 due to it coming out earlier.
Hey, multiplat or not i can happily say that Dead rising is my fave game this generation by a country mile.
But none of them scored 90%
So therefore the 360 games that have scored 90%+ have scored that on merit.