Munkeh111 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Munkeh111 said:
I can't believe they would make another WW2 game... though I would probably still end up buying it, assuming you are meaning that CoD would stay WW2, and MW would be as the name implies. I agree about the idea of buying branded every other year, but the sales of WaW would seemingly go against that
|
I still think Treyarch should stick with a war though. Maybe it's time they venture to Vietnam finally. I would be all up for it, but they would probably have to tone it down a bit from the reality.
|
I'm not sure about Vietnam, it would certainly make for a different game, I'm not sure what Treyarch should do, but they can't keep making WW2 games forever
|
They definitely can't keep up WW2 forever, but they need to progress forward. Going back to World War I or earlier is going to get less fun to play. The weapons will get more primitive. Maybe they need to branch out how the game is played. Maybe a wartime game will feel fresh if it's more army based like Battlefield and Warhawk, however people were none too pleased about tanks in COD: WaW and wanted them removed.
Overall it's going to be hard to tell Activision that WW2 is burnt out when COD: WaW is selling as well as it is. Sales do not reflect people tiring out.