By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Tales of Symphonia vs Tales of Phantasia

I was talking to the guy at my gaming store about the SNES version and he said that it wasn't released in NA. Even if it was, they would likely charge 90-110$ for it.



I am Washu-bot B, loyal servant of Final-Fan, the greatest scientific genius in the universe!


Around the Network

Phantasia is really good, but it's also really old school.
For coolness points, it's a distant prequel to Symphonia, and there are a lot of little nods to Phantasia in Symphonia because of this including place, character names, historical references, etc.



Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.

Riot Of The Blood said:
I was talking to the guy at my gaming store about the SNES version and he said that it wasn't released in NA. Even if it was, they would likely charge 90-110$ for it.

 

not "officially," if you get my drift >.>;



blaydcor said:
Phantasia is really good, but it's also really old school.
For coolness points, it's a distant prequel to Symphonia, and there are a lot of little nods to Phantasia in Symphonia because of this including place, character names, historical references, etc.

 

symphonia is the prequel, phantasia happened thousands of years after it.



ToP got one of the worst batle system of any RPG ever developped. It's start alright but as you go farther in the game and gain more member they end up taking about half the screen, which is a real hinderance since you can't move past them, the one in the back basicly don't attack at all unless specificly told to and even then they may not have anykind of worthwhile long range attack, even the archer can't seem to fire farther then his nose. In the end you end up killing the enemies with the character you control while the other stand there like mentally deficient zombie and get in the way.

It's sad that it's easier to kill enemies when you whole party is dead than alive, since that way you can at least move past there heavely mutilated dead bodies(ok, unconscious body but can't a guy dream?).

It may be a classic in some way but it doesn't mean it's any good. In the same vein of classic Star Ocean is head and shoulder above it.

The story is alright though.



Persons without argument hide behind their opinion

Around the Network

use Cless as a tank, Mint a a healer in the second spot, summoner at third, and magic caster at 4th with range nukes, archer sucks in general even if improved in the remakes.



Soriku said:
blaydcor said:
Phantasia is really good, but it's also really old school.
For coolness points, it's a distant prequel to Symphonia, and there are a lot of little nods to Phantasia in Symphonia because of this including place, character names, historical references, etc.

 

Actually Phantasia happens 4000 years after ToS. ToS: DotNW fills up holes within ToS and ToP and makes them fit better btw.

 

 

Yeah, that's what I mean to say :p. It's been too long since I've busted out my Tales lore.

Though on a side note I found DotNW kind of shitty, really disappointing since Symphonia is one of my favorite games ever.



Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.

If you like old school games, you should try it and get the GBA port.
though i would recommend the PSP Japanese one.