We don't have naturally-inalienable rights. Simply because in America, we try, through legislation and personal action, to give each person the chance at life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In Zimbabwe, it may be a little bit different take on what they feel are human rights.
Rights aren't natural, they are earned, then given as the society feels that they should be given. In America, we fought against the Brits over what we felt were rights. In the Civil War, we did it again based on another set of rights. We've progressed with what we feel rights are. However, we now are to the point that we must question where rights end - at society, or at the government.
And I tend to subscribe to MrMafoo's great Gerald Ford quotation about the intrinsic nature of government being able to give, and take away, based on what power they are given.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.















