By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Question about what Obama just said.

TheRealMafoo said:
SciFiBoy said:
TheRealMafoo said:
SciFiBoy said:

i live in the UK not the US for which im eternaly greatfull

I am grateful you live in the UK too. I assume if you lived here, you would expect me to pay for you to live.

Let me put this into perspective... I pay over 35% in taxes, and I work for a living (I am not rich).

That means if the government took there share first, I would have to work January, and give it all to them. Then work February, and give it all to them. Then work March, and give it all to them. Then work April, and give it all to them. After a few days in May, I can start keeping what I make.

If I was in the lower 30% income earners, I would start keeping what I make January 1.

Somehow, I think I do ok by the poor. Asking me to do more is a little crazy.

aint my country a bitch? free healthcare and a better education system than your nations, yeah dont we suck? we also help the less fortunate in our society, really evil aint it?

you dont seem to understand taxation, taxes pay for public services, taxes pay for your military

 

I have to go to bed, so this is the last post tonight.

I am not against taxation, it's what it's used for that matter however.

Let's say I was not in a country at all. Just a guy with some land. To protect my rights, I would have to guard my house, protect my property and livestock, and do the things needed to survive. Let's say that took 18 hours a day.

One day a man comes up and asks if I want to join his group to collectively protect ours, and 10 other peoples land. I say sure, Now I only have to work 16 hours a day. Not a bad deal. Let's say they then come to me and say “well, we need a fill time cop, and instead of the two hours a day you put in as a cop, we can hire one that's better then us, and pay him. it will cost you 2 hours a day worth of corn.”

So, being I am a better farmer then a cop, I can make the payment in an hour compared to two hours policing. Now I am down to 15 hours a day, and being taxed an hour of it.

This is the kind of taxation that's required, and I should have to pay.

So, now the guy comes to me and say's. Well, some people just aren't pulling that share, so can you work an extra hour a day to pay the cop?

Now we are in a progressive tax system. Sucks, but I am still not horrified by it. Up to 16 hours a day though.

Now the man comes to me and says. Well, some people don't have food, so your going to have to work another 3 hours so we can take your crops and give it to them. Now I am up to 19 hours.

This is where taxation becomes wrong. You are indenturing me, to provide for people. I am now working in the service of others, and it's an infringement of my rights. It's not what I signed up for when I entered this agreement, but if I don't, they are going to throw me in jail.

Take my corn to pay for my responsibilities. Ask me for corn to feed others. Taking my corn to feed others is wrong.

how do you know that? maybe they arent as strong as you, maybe they arent as fast as you, they cant help that, its genetics, why shouldnt you help the less able?

 



Around the Network
SciFiBoy said:

did you earn it though? someone payed you it, but earning it means that its 100% fair given the work you do, so its unlikely thats true, especially if you earn more than 100k a year, i really dont see what human being is worth that much money, if any. the money you voulantry give is alot less than taxation and welfare would be giving them

 

 

So if a football team is going to gross 500 million a year with player x, and 300 million a year without him, he is not worth more then 100k?



Final-Fan said:
TheRealMafoo said:
Let me put this into perspective... I pay over 35% in taxes, and I work for a living (I am not rich).

That means if the government took there share first, I would have to work January, and give it all to them. Then work February, and give it all to them. Then work March, and give it all to them. Then work April, and give it all to them. After a few days in May, I can start keeping what I make.

If I was in the lower 30% income earners, I would start keeping what I make January 1.

Somehow, I think I do ok by the poor. Asking me to do more is a little crazy. 

I ... don't believe those nuimbers.

Exactly what don't you believe? That's exactly what American taxation is like.

I'll give you an example from my actual work stub:

Income Earned: $5,025

  • Federal Income Taxes: $598
  • Medicare: $70
  • Social Security: $301
  • State Income Taxes: $122

That's 21.7% + State Sales Tax (7.0% where I live, on all purchases) on whatever I buy, which equals out to about 28.7%. I make $30,000/yr on salary, so I am certainly in the lower section of taxation. In my case, every 4th paycheck goes to the government for FIT, Medicare, SS, and SIT alone. If you are on welfare, or the like, you keep your money, and do not get taxed on it.

Now, in my case:

  • I will never use medicare (I have private health insurance through my company)
  • I will never withdrawl from Social Security (virtually useless. Will put about 1/2 what is taken out in SS into a 401k or other investment and make far, far more)
  • I was never publically schooled. I was home schooled, and my education cost under $500/yr

Yet I pay for them. Crazy world with crazy taxes. I think that some of the people arguing on these forums about taxation have never paid taxes, and realized how their money gets spent. Americans constantly argue about minimum/living wages, but fail to realize that a large part of what could be living wages are taken out via taxation, and not due to minimum standards.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

SciFiBoy said:

how do you know that? maybe they arent as strong as you, maybe they arent as fast as you, they cant help that, its genetics, why shouldnt you help the less able?

 

I should help the less able, and I would. My government should never force me too though. In the example I gave, how is it not stealing from me if I say no?

 



Tyrannical said:
SciFiBoy said:

oic, you think africans and mexicans should die in there own country or on your streets then, good to know

 

 

The US is under no obligation to take in everyone that wants to live here. I think they need to pay more attention on how to make their own country a better place to live.

im not saying let them all in, obviously criminals shouldnt be let in, but law abiding citizens who can work and boost your economy?



Around the Network
TheRealMafoo said:
Final-Fan said:
TheRealMafoo said:
Let me put this into perspective... I pay over 35% in taxes, and I work for a living (I am not rich).

That means if the government took there share first, I would have to work January, and give it all to them. Then work February, and give it all to them. Then work March, and give it all to them. Then work April, and give it all to them. After a few days in May, I can start keeping what I make.

If I was in the lower 30% income earners, I would start keeping what I make January 1.

Somehow, I think I do ok by the poor. Asking me to do more is a little crazy.
I ... don't believe those numbers.
What numbers do you think are wrong? We live in the same high taxed state btw :p

Well, although I'm not sure about you paying over 35% in taxes, it's certainly conceivable.  But I am completely sure that you are wrong about the lowest 30% not paying any taxes, unless you are only talking about income taxes and not payroll taxes or any other taxes -- which is pretty meaningless for such a discussion IMO.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Scifi boy and broncos724,

Learn to use the row delete button. I'm sick of seeing 8 deep nested quotes when you are only replying to the last one.



Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
 — Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire

TheRealMafoo said:
SciFiBoy said:

how do you know that? maybe they arent as strong as you, maybe they arent as fast as you, they cant help that, its genetics, why shouldnt you help the less able?

 

I should help the less able, and I would. My government should never force me too though. In the example I gave, how is it not stealing from me if I say no?

 

how can you be trusted to give them that money? what if most people dont give that money? you then have poverty and your workforce shrinks, now instead of a 25 farmers, 5 of which are less able, you have 20 farmers, less work can be done

 



TheRealMafoo said:
SciFiBoy said:

did you earn it though? someone payed you it, but earning it means that its 100% fair given the work you do, so its unlikely thats true, especially if you earn more than 100k a year, i really dont see what human being is worth that much money, if any. the money you voulantry give is alot less than taxation and welfare would be giving them

 

 

So if a football team is going to gross 500 million a year with player x, and 300 million a year without him, he is not worth more then 100k?

 

what human is worth 100k a year for anything, sportsmen are a prime example, stupidly overpaid for a job that they could do for 22k a year, the average wage (in the UK)



SciFiBoy said:

how do you know that? maybe they arent as strong as you, maybe they arent as fast as you, they cant help that, its genetics, why shouldnt you help the less able?

Why are you so willing to assume that, 100% of the time, that the person cannot help their predicament?

I'll give you a little life-tip: People aren't created equal. But people also do not put equal effort into their life or lifestyle. If a man decides to not work out of laziness, should you provide food for him? If a man smokes, uses heavy drugs, and develops complications from that, should you pay extra (while living healthy yourself) to ensure the sick man that lived poorly is taken care of?

If you live smartly, invest your money wisely, and have a good job because your motivated, should someone forcefully take from you to give to someone that lives stupidly, blows their money on useless goods, has no job 'just cuz'? I don't see life that way. That's why there are some like Mafoo, and myself that believe that all men are created equal, but not everyone puts the same effort into their life and lifestyle, and should not expect to recieve the same reward. If a man works hard, gets promotions - should he not benefit from it? Shouldn't a person that lives dangerously be punished by the reprocussions of his bad actions?

 



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.