The UK works around this with a tightly knit community programme, something I imagine you don'tget with commercial hospitals. They have obligations to be active within the community set by the government, kind of like the BBC have obligations to satisfy certain audiences. They offer free sex ed and other medical education services for young people and schools, free mother and baby clinics and so on and so forth. It's a good system.

minority yes.

Vast... I'm not so sure. 

For a lot of people I think the stigma of being unemployed means a lot more then satisfaction from working at crappy fast food places and the like.  If they weren't afraid of being looked down opon...

Either way these people are a big drain.

People who willingly do nothing to help themselves or their fellow man.

People who intentionally refuse to do anything and drain resources unlike those naturally afflicted and don't have the choice.

People who intentionally refuse to help themselves or their common man and only live to leech of the state have broken their social contracts in my opinion and the government should have no reponsibility to these people.  Not working because you can't find a job or because you have a disease is acceptable.

Not working because you don't want a job or don't want to cure a disease is not.

humans arent perfect, that dosent mean there not human, yes id prefer that people who can work do, but im not gonna force them if there that set against it, afterall if there that set agianst it forcing them wont help much, just means theyre gonna do the job badly, id rather have someone whos gonna make an effort do the job, the best way to fix the problem is education and social mobility, if we improve thoose things people have better opurtunitys in life and so will get jobs they want to do rather than feel they dont want to work