By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Can someone please tell me where USA went? I can’t find it.

Below Canada and above Mexico!




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

Around the Network
TheRealMafoo said:
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
akuma587 said:
Because the Founding Fathers were concerned about monitoring and maintaining multi-national corporations and had something as dynamic as a world economy and the NYSE to deal with.

Man, they were just completely against the government getting involved in those things. Oh wait...those things DIDNT' EVEN EXIST YET!


Are you trying to tell me that if John Adams were to come back to life, he would approve of what we are doing?

Come on Akuma, you know better than that.

Yeah, he'd probably be confused as to why black people are allowed to be in the army.

Look, I'm sick, and I'm not in the mood to get into a huge political argument. But why would you think that politicians from more than 200 years ago, with completely different issues, would know what's right now? Should the United Kingdom get rid of their idealogies and just go back to whatever the British Empire thought?

 

 

Adams never bought a slave and declined on principle to employ slave labor. I think he would be proud of how far civil rights have come.

Adams fought against the most powerful government of his time, to free him of far less than the US does today. To think he would be remotely for what's going on in the US today is to know nothing about the man.

To think somehow because it was so long ago, that his principals don't apply is extremely misguided as well.

And yet he still spoke out against blacks serving in the army. And stop assuming that you're so smart and that people who disagree with you don't know anything. If we're talking about basic principals, of course they still apply. I'm sure that Adams didn't believe in murder, and neither does the government today. Hell, neither did Moses thousands of years ago. But what you're saying is that Adams would disagree with what the government is doing today, and I say, "DUH!!!" The Founding Fathers would disagree with many things about our government because their time was incredibly different, and you are very misguided for thinking that their all holy rules are 100% relevant regardless of the times.

 



 

 

Right below Canada and above Mexico.



"Recent polls have shown 1/5 of Americans can't locate the U.S. on a world map. Why do you think this is?"



 

 

Can't we throw these AIG exec. dickholes in jail? Treason maybe?



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

Around the Network
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
akuma587 said:
Because the Founding Fathers were concerned about monitoring and maintaining multi-national corporations and had something as dynamic as a world economy and the NYSE to deal with.

Man, they were just completely against the government getting involved in those things. Oh wait...those things DIDNT' EVEN EXIST YET!


Are you trying to tell me that if John Adams were to come back to life, he would approve of what we are doing?

Come on Akuma, you know better than that.

Yeah, he'd probably be confused as to why black people are allowed to be in the army.

Look, I'm sick, and I'm not in the mood to get into a huge political argument. But why would you think that politicians from more than 200 years ago, with completely different issues, would know what's right now? Should the United Kingdom get rid of their idealogies and just go back to whatever the British Empire thought?

 

 

Adams never bought a slave and declined on principle to employ slave labor. I think he would be proud of how far civil rights have come.

Adams fought against the most powerful government of his time, to free him of far less than the US does today. To think he would be remotely for what's going on in the US today is to know nothing about the man.

To think somehow because it was so long ago, that his principals don't apply is extremely misguided as well.

And yet he still spoke out against blacks serving in the army. And stop assuming that you're so smart and that people who disagree with you don't know anything. If we're talking about basic principals, of course they still apply. I'm sure that Adams didn't believe in murder, and neither does the government today. Hell, neither did Moses thousands of years ago. But what you're saying is that Adams would disagree with what the government is doing today, and I say, "DUH!!!" The Founding Fathers would disagree with many things about our government because their time was incredibly different, and you are very misguided for thinking that their all holy rules are 100% relevant regardless of the times.

 

 

Adams would have been against economic redistribution, in any form. The amount of money the US has redistributed blatantly this year, is more than most countries have.

If the bailout was a county, it would have had the 13th largest GDP, and that's just one bailout package.

I don't act like I am smarter than the rest, but give me a break. Who in their right mind thinks what we have done over the last 6 months is sane?

I hope no one. So stop defending it!



TheRealMafoo said:
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
akuma587 said:
Because the Founding Fathers were concerned about monitoring and maintaining multi-national corporations and had something as dynamic as a world economy and the NYSE to deal with.

Man, they were just completely against the government getting involved in those things. Oh wait...those things DIDNT' EVEN EXIST YET!


Are you trying to tell me that if John Adams were to come back to life, he would approve of what we are doing?

Come on Akuma, you know better than that.

Yeah, he'd probably be confused as to why black people are allowed to be in the army.

Look, I'm sick, and I'm not in the mood to get into a huge political argument. But why would you think that politicians from more than 200 years ago, with completely different issues, would know what's right now? Should the United Kingdom get rid of their idealogies and just go back to whatever the British Empire thought?

 

 

Adams never bought a slave and declined on principle to employ slave labor. I think he would be proud of how far civil rights have come.

Adams fought against the most powerful government of his time, to free him of far less than the US does today. To think he would be remotely for what's going on in the US today is to know nothing about the man.

To think somehow because it was so long ago, that his principals don't apply is extremely misguided as well.

And yet he still spoke out against blacks serving in the army. And stop assuming that you're so smart and that people who disagree with you don't know anything. If we're talking about basic principals, of course they still apply. I'm sure that Adams didn't believe in murder, and neither does the government today. Hell, neither did Moses thousands of years ago. But what you're saying is that Adams would disagree with what the government is doing today, and I say, "DUH!!!" The Founding Fathers would disagree with many things about our government because their time was incredibly different, and you are very misguided for thinking that their all holy rules are 100% relevant regardless of the times.

 

 

Adams would have been against economic redistribution, in any form. The amount of money the US has redistributed blatantly this year, is more than most countries have.

If the bailout was a county, it would have had the 13th largest GDP, and that's just one bailout package.

I don't act like I am smarter than the rest, but give me a break. Who in their right mind thinks what we have done over the last 6 months is sane?

I hope no one. So stop defending it!

And yet you still don't understand how the 18th century was different from the 21st century. In the 18th century, there was barely even a middle class and rich elitists pretty much owned the government. Hell, there wasn't even any money to redistribute. At the time of the Founding Fathers, America was, surprise, being founded. No one cared about helping the poor and redistributing money because no one could. Then again, I shouldn't have differing opinions. That makes me insane and makes you angry.

 



 

 

I dunno. I think the real troubling this is that basically the government is voiding agreed opon contracts.

I mean... that's something that usually only third world countries resorts to and tends to hurt your investment base.

I mean who wants to make a deal when they aren't sure whether or not the government will actually honor it.

 

It's why Iraq is considered a much better place to invest and safer place to get oil then Venezula.


I mean they are basically blackmailing these people.  Whether they deserve their money or not it's in their contracts.

It's really... really stupid... and i'd like one person if favor of it to tell me why it's a good idea.



MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:
MontanaHatchet said:
TheRealMafoo said:

 stop assuming that you're so smart and that people who disagree with you don't know anything.

And yet you still don't understand how the 18th century was different from the 21st century

 

You keep acting like I am belittling people, yet the only personal attacks I see are these two.



AIG lost 61 BILLION dollars in a quarter last year.

they are using BAILOUT Money to give High rank executives million dollar bonuses over around 170 million!!!