By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Greenpeace: Microsoft and Nintendo companies worst for the environment?

BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
Onyxmeth said:

I don't see how it's possible that Nintendo, which is posting massive profits and is employing far fewer people than Sony can score worse in that category. Can someone explain how that could happen that has more knowledge on the subject?

They didn't give greenpeace any information.

So Greenpeace decided to just rank them low.

Also... for what they could get... it's an average.

So despite the fact that the PS3 wastes way more energy then the Wii...

Sony makes much more products.

SUUUUUUURE THEY DID. They got paid by Sony to publish this and i am sure they have nothing better to do than puting one small video game company on the bottom just because they want so. Seriously, the stupidest excuse i ever saw.

 

Actually it's a well documented fact that's what they did.

This is greenpeace you know.  The people who activaly assault people to save the enviroment.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/sailing/1995944.stm

They're practically terrorists.



Around the Network

Some of you people need to take off your tin foil hats, on both sides.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Kasz216 said:
BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
Onyxmeth said:

I don't see how it's possible that Nintendo, which is posting massive profits and is employing far fewer people than Sony can score worse in that category. Can someone explain how that could happen that has more knowledge on the subject?

They didn't give greenpeace any information.

So Greenpeace decided to just rank them low.

Also... for what they could get... it's an average.

So despite the fact that the PS3 wastes way more energy then the Wii...

Sony makes much more products.

SUUUUUUURE THEY DID. They got paid by Sony to publish this and i am sure they have nothing better to do than puting one small video game company on the bottom just because they want so. Seriously, the stupidest excuse i ever saw.

 

Actually it's a well documented fact that's what they did.

This is greenpeace you know.  The people who activaly assault people to save the enviroment.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/sailing/1995944.stm

They're practically terrorists.

What does that have do do with Nintendo having the lowest rank? Why would they put Sony on the top and Nintendo on the bottom?



BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
Onyxmeth said:

I don't see how it's possible that Nintendo, which is posting massive profits and is employing far fewer people than Sony can score worse in that category. Can someone explain how that could happen that has more knowledge on the subject?

They didn't give greenpeace any information.

So Greenpeace decided to just rank them low.

Also... for what they could get... it's an average.

So despite the fact that the PS3 wastes way more energy then the Wii...

Sony makes much more products.

SUUUUUUURE THEY DID. They got paid by Sony to publish this and i am sure they have nothing better to do than puting one small video game company on the bottom just because they want so. Seriously, the stupidest excuse i ever saw.

 

Actually it's a well documented fact that's what they did.

This is greenpeace you know.  The people who activaly assault people to save the enviroment.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/sailing/1995944.stm

They're practically terrorists.

What does that have do do with Nintendo having the lowest rank? Why would they put Sony on the top and Nintendo on the bottom?

Did you attempt to read the thread at all?