Greenpeace: Microsoft and Nintendo companies worst for the environment?

[SeriousWB]

BladeOfGod said:

Kasz216 said:

BladeOfGod said:

Kasz216 said:

Onyxmeth said:

I don't see how it's possible that Nintendo, which is posting massive profits and is employing far fewer people than Sony can score worse in that category. Can someone explain how that could happen that has more knowledge on the subject?

They didn't give greenpeace any information.

So Greenpeace decided to just rank them low.

Also... for what they could get... it's an average.

So despite the fact that the PS3 wastes way more energy then the Wii...

Sony makes much more products.

SUUUUUUURE THEY DID. They got paid by Sony to publish this and i am sure they have nothing better to do than puting one small video game company on the bottom just because they want so. Seriously, the stupidest excuse i ever saw.

 

Actually it's a well documented fact that's what they did.

This is greenpeace you know.  The people who activaly assault people to save the enviroment.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/sailing/1995944.stm

They're practically terrorists.

What does that have do do with Nintendo having the lowest rank? Why would they put Sony on the top and Nintendo on the bottom?

Did you attempt to read the thread at all?