akuma587 on 11 March 2009
Many of them are from Republicans. The problem is that we don't have a line item veto for things like this. We really could use a line item veto amendment to the Constitution with the line item veto limited to cutting down on things like earmarks. I would definitely support it.
About 5% or less of the money is specifically earmarks. The rest is normal budget items that the government needs to keep working on a day-to-day basis. The problem is that the legislative process is extremely slow, and it can be harder to take these things out rather than put them back in. We could definitely use some constitutional amendments to make this process move smoother on budget items.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson