I think their graphic score was a little high.

Yeah, don't like DMC and god of War and never played the Ninja Gaiden series.  You're telling me those are all less than 8 hours though?  I don't seem to remember hearing people bitching about all those.

The thing about them is that they're all highly replayable, and the kind of person who really likes those games is going to try to beat them on higher difficulties, and unlock the dozens of extra missions in Ninja Gaiden Black, and what have you...

They end up extending the experience. They prescribe to the old arcade style of gameplay, where it's short but very intense and immensely replayable. I've beaten Ninja Gaiden Black something like four or five times, not including the 50 unlockable missions.

If you don't replay beat-em-ups/slash-em-ups then you truly need to leave the genre alone..

The Dynasty Warriors games can get you a lot more then 5-6 hours worth...

i can spend about 40 hours playing dynasty warriors :D

Naum said: Wow that's like a 9.5 - 9-8 game on PS360

More like 11/10  ;)

IGN UK gave it 8.9

Nice score alltogether - the game obviously doesn't dissapoint, and for those who want to milk it out there is the hard difficulty.

A worthy new IP for Wii i would say.

Just noticed there is a Eurogamer Madworld review, only 7/01 :/


http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/madworld-review


Well, we all know EG hates wii :)

Good score but maybe not great for the game since it will be competing with the more popular RE5 which also got a 9.0. A 9.2-9.5 for this game would have pushed it further into attracting more people that don't have a Wii but enjoy mature themed games imo. I predict 1 to 2 million sales for the game but maybe not the 5 million that a higher score probably would have attracted and forced Nintendo's hand into releasing more mature games on the console.