Actually, reading it it seems to be split between decent games that are essentially even, or games that are either poor ports or strangely broken .

I was particularly curious that, according to this, SH on 360 is in a much higher resolution but suffers from bad frame rate, while the PS3 version is in a lower resolution, with no frame rate issues (sounds like the real problem in the game engine is crap and the developer decided to throw a bit more at 360 knowing 360 owners would demand the higher res but really shouldn't have).

The bottom line remains, developers are still too often taking the east route with average to okay coding efforts on 360 then cutting corners in getting the code onto the PS3.

Again, this tells us nothing about the core machines, but plenty about their SDKs and the relevant experience/skills of certain developers.

Awww, someone's feeling insecure...

ah well, theres always the next round!

omfg r u serious ?!!!!! :-0 round 18 wow
YAWN!

It looks like Skate 2 and Need for Speed are better on the 360, Silent Hill and Endwar are better on the PS3, and the rest are just as equally good/bad.

Do these games play the same?

Oh well, then there you go.

Wat ever happened to that patch that NFS undercover was supposed to get  the new NFS is about to come out

Epic...

So the product of EA leading on the PS3 is.... better framerates on the Xbox 360 STILL?

Wow, I wonder if the Xbox 360, inspite of its ugly appearances has great performance? oOooO NEVER!!!

The funny thing is that most of the people saying that actually paid $400 for their X360.  On top of that, they pay to "unlock" the multiplayer content ALREADY on the $60 games they purchase. ;)