slowmo said:
It's customary if you're going to commit liable that you place links as evidence, I've not read about it before so I'd be interested to see the articles.
|
On their wikipedia page.
http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p244/MaddMoose/crysis.jpg"..." /> http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p244/MaddMoose/crysis.jpg"..." /> http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p244/MaddMoose/crysis.jpg"..." /> http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p244/MaddMoose/crysis.jpg"..." />
slowmo said:
It's customary if you're going to commit liable that you place links as evidence, I've not read about it before so I'd be interested to see the articles.
|
On their wikipedia page.
Congratulations. I would have turned my back on pc gaming completely if it wasnt for strategy games (and maybe valve). Crytek are just really bad devs putting out such a game. In warhead at one some you're running at 60 fps and then you get onto a moving train and hardly get 20 fps.
without fail every time there is a majour release, there are at least 50 threads that are utterly pointless relating to the game
Again? Crysis has the best graphics; check. Crysis is shit; check. There, done.
To the OP's cred; Crysis looks nothing like the promoshots on any rig I've seen it played on and when it gets close it stutters almost to a complete halt ("but that's how amazing Crytek are, a future proof game!" - no, they are bad at optimization and aimed the game at PC's that didn't exist at the time and still mostly don't, what's the point?).
No games look like their promoshots (use Mass Effect, Oblivion, Fallout 3 and Resistance 2 as examples as well, huge difference).
yeah i was done with PC gaming in the late 90's wen the ps1 came out i just could take upgrading and installing and just sitting close to a PC monitor to play
The PC does still have some of the best sim games to date that still arent on consoles once those games come to the consoles then console gaming will be unmatched

Play Me
4 9800GX2's? at 20fps? That boy has got some spyware!
My Pentium D and 7900GS could do that. You take any console game available for PC and the PC version will look superior, and no you dont need a really expensive computer to do it either. I've had my rig since 2004, and upgraded the video card ONCE, and can still play every game that comes out at settings better than consoles. My computer can do lots of other stuff to boot!
However, consoles are still a good buy, and the gaurantee that you will never have to upgrade parts is pretty nice. In the case of the PS3 its a very good value for its HD media abilities. But alas, PC gaming will also be better looking that consoles, its a simple fact. Just because Crysis looks like shit on your craptastic $199 rig doesnt mean it looks that way on everyone elses.
Edit: Come to think of it, you could call PC gamers the Elite Gamers. You have to be willing to put some down to join, but in the end, it's all worth it.

Crysis has around 3 hours of game play in it and requires a 12GB install on PC. Most of these screen shots of Crysis posted on the net are fake.
BTW: The game play in Crysis is one of the worst shooters in terms of game play.
Any PC gammer who buys a quad-core has no idea what they are doing.
| Majin-Tenshinhan said: Too bad PC controls are far superior, then. |
I would rather play any game(except RTS and MMORPGs)on a controller than a keyboard, IMO controllers are better.