By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Test your faith, stab your son

Gee, that sounds like a pain in the ass!



Around the Network
SamuelRSmith said:
You can become addicted to things without the said things having the necessary chemicals. Do you think that gambling addicts get injected with nicotine every time they use the slots?

Those are properly called habits. An addiction is defined by the pain and/or illness a person experiences when they can no longer consume a non-essential substance. For example, quiting heroin causes pain, powerful cold sensations and mental distress whereas quiting marijuana caused loss of appetite and mild insomnia. Repeated use of marijuana arises from the enjoyment of using it, not a dependance on getting a fix to prevent the painful withdrawal symptoms that define an addiction. Therefore pot smokers aren't addicts.

Aj_habfan said:
Gee, that sounds like a pain in the ass!

 

A winner is you!



Proud member of the Mega Mario Movement

Check out my daily drawings here and help keep me on task!

mrjuju said:
Aj_habfan said:
Gee, that sounds like a pain in the ass!

 

A winner is you!

 

I agree.. lol



SSBB FC: 5155 2671 4071 elgefe02: "VGChartz's Resident Raving Rabbit"   MKWii:5155-3729-0989

WessleWoggle said:
MrBubbles said:
WessleWoggle said:
thetonestarr said:
This has nothing to do with faith. This has nothing to do with Christianity/the Bible, even.

This has everything to do with oppressive non-Biblical traditions that people blindly follow, as well as what appears to be significant psychological issues.

 

You state this like it's fact. You don't know the situation, you don't know if his personal beliefs had anything do with what happened, and calling unstated non bible traditions 'opressive' is just plainly, bullshit. If you're going to insult a non-biblical tradition do it directly instead of making a ambiguous statement.

So, trying to make people believe if they don't believe some woo-woo story about a 2000 year old dead man who 'sacrificed' himself to us, then resurected himself(how was it a sacrifice if he resurected himself?), they're going to hell? That's not opressive?

The christian God sounds like an opressive cunt to me, more so than these ambiguous 'non-biblical' traditions that you imply people 'blindly' follow. People follow things for difference reasons. You shouldn't infer on the reasons people believe anything, and you shouldn't be a 'idea bigot' and put all non-biblical traditions into a category of 'blindly following'.

Implying that this has anything to do with non biblical traditions is bull shit. You shouldn't infer on anything that you don't have the full story about, and this story was so short, there was no need for offensive religious inferences.

But anyways I'm sure you're aware of the fact that the thread title was a joke and I do agree with you on the point of psychological issues.

as far as i am aware, it doesnt tell people to take their hats off  while in church in the bible.  so hes absolutely correct and you have been reported for your disgusting, ignorant comments.

 

MY problem as I indicated in my original post, was that he stated his comment like fact, and also insulted, ambiguosly, non-biblical ideas, and also said people follow them blindly. I took this out of the context of the thread because I am a douchebag, and my brain didn't connect to the ideas at the time because I just finished a religious debate elsewhere.

While my comments may be discusting to someone with a closed mind of a particular religous or moral persuation, I fail to see where ignorance takes part. Ignorance to scripture? I feel I wrapped it up quite nicely, though I didn't sugar coat it.

Anyways I should have left my religious hostilities off VGchartz, but sadly I was baiting to see if someone would post a comment like yours, I've been awake too long, just quit smoking, but still I fall short of a real excuse. I'm just an asshole.

I'll except my ban like a man, for trolling and religiously offensive comments, though I'm not sorry, because I understand what I was thinking at the time. I found his statements as offensive towards secular ideas, mainly from the 'blindly following' part. Now I realize I was just being overly touchy.

Yeah, you most definitely took me entirely incorrectly. While I can understand a little misunderstanding, you were absolutely uncalled for. Frankly, even if I had said something offensive, that's no excuse to fire back something twice as offensive. Ever heard of maturity? Decency? You should probably check 'em out; sounds like you've been without either for a while.

What I was saying is that many people claiming to be "Christians" have adopted dozens and dozens of so-called "Christian" beliefs and traditions that have absolutely no basis whatsoever in the Bible. This would be an example of one. The Bible does mention head-coverings while "prophesying", but it doesn't specify what sort of coverings and it does specify "while prophesying". It also specifically had to do with the culture during Biblical times.

 

Point is, guy was overreacting on something that God doesn't even have any rules over. And he overreacted in a Biblically sinful manner. The idiot.



 SW-5120-1900-6153

Around the Network
WessleWoggle said:I'm for a different brand of peace and tolerance than you. The bible is a peice of shit that causes a lot of harm in the world, and the good things it causes(like charity, and morals and such) could easily be caused by something that has a lot less mythology and useless bullshit rules in it.

Your version of peace and tolerance sound like a goody goody 'let's all get along and not offend eachother, be civil' type, and my type is, 'people shouldn't be offended in the first place, express yourself'.

 

Oh, so you use peace and tolerance as an excuse to say and do whatever you desire. That is...convenient.

 



WessleWoggle said:
Jackson50 said:

Woggle, I am thoroughly impressed with your steadfast commitment to tolerance, peace, and understanding. First, you called the bible a "foul piece of shit" Now, you call the Christian God an "offensive cunt." You truly are a paragon of peace and tolerance.

Anyway, this guy must have forgotten that it is spare the rod and not spare the knife.

I'm for a different brand of peace and tolerance than you. The bible is a peice of shit that causes a lot of harm in the world, and the good things it causes(like charity, and morals and such) could easily be caused by something that has a lot less mythology and useless bullshit rules in it.

Your version of peace and tolerance sound like a goody goody 'let's all get along and not offend eachother, be civil' type, and my type is, 'people shouldn't be offended in the first place, express yourself'. 

Then feel free to name some spectacular Atheist-built charities. I'd love to hear how many charities they've established.

I don't see what's wrong with the idea that we should respect eachother as opposed to not caring at all.

 



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

WessleWoggle said:No, not an excuse, a reason. It's not convenient, as I still get people like you judging me without actually explaining why it's a bad thing, that people shouldn't be offended.

I like to go by that saying 'Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me'.

I don't do whatever I desire, only say. People who are offeneded by words are silly and need to take themselfs less seriously.

Yes, it is an excuse. I could not care less whether people should be offended or not, I simply care about other people. It is undeniable that people are offended by words. Saying things that will knowingly offend people is not tolerant simply because you believe people should not be offended by words. It is the antithesis of tolerance.    

 



WessleWoggle said:I care about other people but not their silly connotations of words, phrases, or statements, level of being offensive.

It is undeniable that people are offended by words, and frankly, I think they're douchebags.

Saying things, and having people be offended by them shows intolerance on their part and free speaking on my part, it's not the antithesis of tolerance, it's a different kind of tolerance.

No, it is not a different kind of tolerance. Tolerance is not about you. Tolerance is about the other person. It is about how you treat people. Offending people is not tolerant.

 



people shouldnt be tolerant of intolerance.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur