Test your faith, stab your son

[thetonestarr]

WessleWoggle said:

MrBubbles said:

WessleWoggle said:

thetonestarr said:
This has nothing to do with faith. This has nothing to do with Christianity/the Bible, even.

This has everything to do with oppressive non-Biblical traditions that people blindly follow, as well as what appears to be significant psychological issues.

 

You state this like it's fact. You don't know the situation, you don't know if his personal beliefs had anything do with what happened, and calling unstated non bible traditions 'opressive' is just plainly, bullshit. If you're going to insult a non-biblical tradition do it directly instead of making a ambiguous statement.

So, trying to make people believe if they don't believe some woo-woo story about a 2000 year old dead man who 'sacrificed' himself to us, then resurected himself(how was it a sacrifice if he resurected himself?), they're going to hell? That's not opressive?

The christian God sounds like an opressive cunt to me, more so than these ambiguous 'non-biblical' traditions that you imply people 'blindly' follow. People follow things for difference reasons. You shouldn't infer on the reasons people believe anything, and you shouldn't be a 'idea bigot' and put all non-biblical traditions into a category of 'blindly following'.

Implying that this has anything to do with non biblical traditions is bull shit. You shouldn't infer on anything that you don't have the full story about, and this story was so short, there was no need for offensive religious inferences.

But anyways I'm sure you're aware of the fact that the thread title was a joke and I do agree with you on the point of psychological issues.

as far as i am aware, it doesnt tell people to take their hats off  while in church in the bible.  so hes absolutely correct and you have been reported for your disgusting, ignorant comments.

 

MY problem as I indicated in my original post, was that he stated his comment like fact, and also insulted, ambiguosly, non-biblical ideas, and also said people follow them blindly. I took this out of the context of the thread because I am a douchebag, and my brain didn't connect to the ideas at the time because I just finished a religious debate elsewhere.

While my comments may be discusting to someone with a closed mind of a particular religous or moral persuation, I fail to see where ignorance takes part. Ignorance to scripture? I feel I wrapped it up quite nicely, though I didn't sugar coat it.

Anyways I should have left my religious hostilities off VGchartz, but sadly I was baiting to see if someone would post a comment like yours, I've been awake too long, just quit smoking, but still I fall short of a real excuse. I'm just an asshole.

I'll except my ban like a man, for trolling and religiously offensive comments, though I'm not sorry, because I understand what I was thinking at the time. I found his statements as offensive towards secular ideas, mainly from the 'blindly following' part. Now I realize I was just being overly touchy.

Yeah, you most definitely took me entirely incorrectly. While I can understand a little misunderstanding, you were absolutely uncalled for. Frankly, even if I had said something offensive, that's no excuse to fire back something twice as offensive. Ever heard of maturity? Decency? You should probably check 'em out; sounds like you've been without either for a while.

What I was saying is that many people claiming to be "Christians" have adopted dozens and dozens of so-called "Christian" beliefs and traditions that have absolutely no basis whatsoever in the Bible. This would be an example of one. The Bible does mention head-coverings while "prophesying", but it doesn't specify what sort of coverings and it does specify "while prophesying". It also specifically had to do with the culture during Biblical times.

 

Point is, guy was overreacting on something that God doesn't even have any rules over. And he overreacted in a Biblically sinful manner. The idiot.