By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is it in Microsofts interest that PS3 sells more units?

badgenome on 20 February 2009

The bigger question is, "Why is somebody who has F.E.A.R. 2 and Street Fighter IV playing X-Blades?"



Around the Network
disolitude on 20 February 2009
badgenome said:
The bigger question is, "Why is somebody who has F.E.A.R. 2 and Street Fighter IV playing X-Blades?"

Lol...impulse rental last night. Will be returned this weekend. I finished FEAr 2 tho so lots of SF4 in the future...

 



Words Of Wisdom on 20 February 2009
disolitude said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
I think the question you mean to ask is "Would the 360 be less harmed were customers to spend money on the PS3 instead of the Wii?"

Asking if you benefit by your potential customers spending their money on a competitor's products instead of potentially on your products seems silly.

While technically I agree that it doesn't really make sense on paper... I don't think its a silly way of thinking. I mean, PS3 will not get much exclusive development from 3rd parties unless sony pays for it. MS also won't get much unless they can pull away from Sony by 10-15 million consoles. MS's presence in Japan is still pathetic and that wont change this gen...but if PS3 gets it together in that region and starts selling as much as the Wii, it may have a beneficial impact on future titles developed for Japan. etc...

Right now you need to look at it through the eyes of the stakeholders...

Single platform Developers say... "We benefit from the console we develop for selling."
Multiplatform (PS360) Developers say... "We benefit from either console we develop for selling."
Microsoft says... "We benefit from developers choosing to develop on our machine and when customers buy games for it."

Every time a consumer buys a 360, Microsoft gains directly and its exclusive/non-exclusive developers gain indirectly.
Every time a consumer buys a 360 game, Microsoft gains directly and its exclusive/non-exclusive developers gain directly.
Every time a consumer buys a PS3, non-exclusive developers gain indirectly.
Every time a consumer buys a PS3 game, non-exclusive developers gain directly.
Every time a consumer buys a Wii or Wii game, none of the 3 above parties gain.

The problem for Microsoft is that the PS3 is a substitute for the 360.  If someone buys a PS3, there's a chance they will buy the PS3 versions of games instead of 360.  This is, of course, assuming they already have a 360 because if they don't they're hurting Microsoft even more by buying a PS3 instead of a 360 in the first place!

So developers gaining is good for Microsoft but it's a rather painful mixed blessing.



TRios_Zen on 20 February 2009

If 3rd party software continues to sell at a good clip on the 360, I don't know that any potential sales on the Wii would cause those third party developers to ignore an approximate 50 million combined HD user base.

So that being said, I'd think the MS would always prefer sales of the 360 vis-a-vis any other competitor.



c0rd on 20 February 2009

No, pretty sure it isn't.

You could say that people choosing to buy a PS3 instead of a Wii would help them, sure. However, that isn't what will happen if a PS3 gets a price cut. When HD consoles had price cuts in the past, the Wii remains unaffected, while the other HD console suffers. Just look at what happened to the PS3 in 2008. Microsoft definitely does not want that.