What was Resistance, cause thats good enough.
And whats better, 60fps with slowdown or a perfect 30fps.
| Killzone3 said: What was Resistance, cause thats good enough. And whats better, 60fps with slowdown or a perfect 30fps. |
perfect 30fps
also, even with PC games that my crap ass laptop can run at 120+fps if theres an option to lock it at a curtain FPS (only Warsaw has this option it seems from what i can tell) I lock it at half the max FPS I can push out for the game, 120fps max = 60fps lock.
Thread gone to shiet after all the wii fanboy trolling.
Go mods.
naznatips said:
No, I'm using it as an example to prove the PS3 has the capability, and then I'm complaining about it not utilizing that capability. Just the same as I criticize Wii games that are half-assed, I don't think it's right for any "killer-ap" to not utilize the power of it's system to it's fullest. Obviously MP3 has much fewer processes to and calculations per framerate to make that 60 FPS lock work, but by amount of calculations per processing power, is it a difference? Actually come to think of it, I take that back. Metroid Prime 3 has an advantage because of it's style. Areas are loaded one at a time and separated by doors. When you open the door to the next room there is a short delay because it loads the room individually, allowing for more advanced effects and faster framerates than the Wii would be capable of in a single connected area. |
completely understand where ur coming from. which is why its good that devs are finally taking games to te next level on ps3. you see cod4, 60fps full AA (not sure about res). its gona be fine, but yea some devs arent getting the full or even half of the ps. sometimes its the devs, but usually its the publisher and it does suck that they want to make the big bucks and force games out before we want them t.
720p isn't a crime. 720p is perfect, specially at 60fps. The problem is that the 360 can do this with ease, and Sony is saying the PS3 can do MORE. If the biggest budget game in history, exclusive, and with 130 developers working on it can't do 1080p at 60fps and still have a tonne of stuff going on (ignoring gameplay for a moment, which better be fantastic unlike the first killzone), then people have no reason to pay a crapload more for a PS3 and should stick to 360. Further to this, the 360 DOES have a couple of games doing 60fps at 1080p, so this game has to run at those stats and have SO MUCH happening that any chance it could run on 360 is debunked
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
| Killzone3 said: I did not see any complaint when the gameplay trailor came out, for all those bitching you sure did not notice it before. I doubt any of you can tell if a game is 720p or 1080p 60fps or 30fps, only way you know is by the developers disclosing that info. If theres s problem people go nuts right away (Assasincs at E3) but funny none of you noticed anything. No really a problem is it now. |
You can't tell on a trailer, but you certainly can on a 42" Plasma. I'm not saying it makes it a bad game, I just think it can do more and it should do more.
I really don't care about the framerate... Rather have 30 smooth then 60 cludgy... Killzone does look good. And a lot brighter then Gears or Resistance... But by January / February / March there will be a lot of great multi-platform NextGen games coming out...
People will be able to have Alone in the Dark, The Club, Star Wars Force Unleashed, Turok, Age of Conan, GTA IV which are in the same territory... Xmas looked crowded and so does the winter months. I know some of these others aren't at the same budget or in the same market, but people will have lots of choices to make.
| MontanaHatchet said: Oh, and frames per second are overrated. |
You have lost all credibility for me with that comment 
I bet 720p@30fps will be ok for ps owners, but for me wouldn't be acceptable. If it was 720p, I would have asked for 60fps. If 30fps, 1080p would make for it.
I don't think that this game would suck because of that, but I'm pretty sure the PS3 could handle 720p@60fps... hell, I even think the 360 could do it (yes, I'm considering the level of detail of the game). Too bad Guerrilla can't do it.
fazz said:
You have lost all credibility for me with that comment I don't think that this game would suck because of that, but I'm pretty sure the PS3 could handle 720p@60fps... hell, I even think the 360 could do it (yes, I'm considering the level of detail of the game). Too bad Guerrilla can't do it. |
And what is the big advantge with 1080p and 60fps ?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
